the extinction of any animal affects what is known as the "food chain".
lets just say there are:
1 cat
10 birds
100 Spiders
1000 flies
basically there is an abundance of animals who are lower in the food chain. this is to feed the animals who are higher up.
(you can't have more animals higher up in the chain than lower as that would then mean the animals towards the bottom will become extinct therefore making the ones at the top die as well, whereas less animals up the top will mean the lower animals will still have a chance to reproduce to feed other animals without becoming extinct themselves.)
from my example we can see that the flies are eaten by the spiders, who are then eaten by the birds and in turn eaten by the cat.
so basically, if one animal dies, potentially all animals could die because something low in the food chain has become extinct.
And if for example the flies die, the spider will have nothing to eat, so it will starve to death, then the birds and cat will for the same reason.
however, not only can something low in the food chain becoming extinct muddle everything up, but animals high in the food chain can too.
for example, if the cat in my previous example were to become extinct then there would be way too many birds as there would be nothing to eat them, they would then require more food and that wont keep the balance of nature in order.
e.g.
0 cats
120 birds
100 spiders
1000 flies
(can anyone see the problem with this example?)
so one animal becoming extinct affects all the animals greatly, hence why everyone should work to keep the natural balance in check.
To simplify this answer, one animal species dying will cause many others to die and then when there is nothing to eat, people will die.
It can cause a decrease in the population of the species that use that species as a food source and an increase in the population of the species that are eaten by that species.
Example: If you have rabbits foxes and grass as three species and the rabbits all died then: The fox population would decrease due to lack of food and the grass population would increase due to lack of predation.
Seriously though dude. Open your text book. XD
If and or when the first species population plummets or becomes extinct, The second species that is supposed to consume that species will no longer be able to, thus dying off as well, so on and so forth. Or the first species produced something for another then died off, same effect happens. It's all chained up.
It's called a parasitic relationship when one species benefits and one species is harmed. A simbiotic relationship is when both species benefit.
Extreme radiation events of the organisms that survive the mass extinctions as they evolve to occupy the niches abandoned by the organisms going extinct.
In mutualism, both species benefit from the relationship, so they rely on each other for survival. If one partner were to disappear, it could disrupt the balance and potentially harm both species involved. Therefore, in most cases, mutualistic partners cannot survive without each other.
A species that relies on only two plant species for food is more vulnerable because if those plants decline due to disease, habitat loss, or climate change, the species has limited options to survive. In contrast, a species that eats a variety of plants has a buffer against changes that affect any one plant species, increasing its chances of finding food even if one source is lost. Biodiversity in diet provides resilience against environmental changes and decreases the risk of extinction.
A one-way relationship where one species benefits at the expense of another is known as parasitism. In this relationship, the species that benefits is called the parasite, while the species that is harmed is known as the host.
False. The loss of a species from an ecosystem can have cascading effects on other species and the overall balance of the ecosystem. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, so the loss of one can disrupt the interconnected relationships within the system.
The idea that the destruction of one species in a community could greatly affect other members of the community has its roots in the hypothesis of community structure proposed by Charles Elton. Elton's work on food webs and trophic cascades helped to highlight the interconnectedness of species within ecosystems and the potential consequences of species loss on ecosystem stability.
It affected or the affect was terrible for example if you are talking about the dinosaurs, it was terrible for them because when some of them died of diseases it dicreased the population, and it also dicreased the food for the carnivores.
It would depend completely on the types of species in question. Some possible effects could be: 1) Mutualism --> both benefit from one other. 2) Predation --> one species benefits while the other suffers. 3) Neutralism --> despite interaction, there is no overall affect on either species. 4) Competition --> both species are negatively affected by the other. 5) Commensalism --> one species benefits while the other is unaffected. 6) Amensalism --> one species is negatively affected and the other is not affected.
I dont even know
No, predation is not a symbiotic relationship.There are five different kinds of symbiotic relationships:Mutualism, where both species benefitCommensalism, where one species What_is_a_symbiotic_relationship, the other is unaffectedParasitism, where one species benefits, the other is harmedCompetition, where neither species benefitsNeutralism, where both species are unaffected
bvggj
This is an example of an ecological concept known as interdependence. It occurs when the actions or presence of one species positively affect another, while negatively impacting a different species. This can lead to complex relationships within ecosystems where different species rely on each other for survival.
environmental changes, predators , diseases , competition !
It messes up the food chain and other animals can die E. R. I.
because of the interdependence of living things The extinction of one species or development of a new one often affect many others because of their interdependence in an ecosystem.
Any new species being introduced into an area will affect the food chain in one way or another. More often than not, especially if the introduction was deliberate, while the new species may be of great help in keeping a pest species under control, it will hurt other species within the food chain because of competition for food, predation that was not present previously, or any number of other factors.