Parasitic and symbiotic.
Examples of parasitic fungi are ringworm and the like. They grow on the organism, and feed off of it. It provides no benefit to the host organism.
Symbiotic fungi would be lichen. It is an algae growing on top of a fungus. The Algae, having chlorophyll, can perform photosynthesis. This benefits the fungus--which is unable to do so--because the fungus then feeds off the algae. The fungus in turn absorbs nutrients from whatever it is growing on, which the algae is able to absorb. So its a win/win situation.
Mycorrhizal symbiosis involves a mutualistic relationship between fungi and plant roots. The fungi provide the plants with increased access to nutrients, especially phosphorus and nitrogen, in exchange for carbohydrates produced by the plants through photosynthesis.
Lichen symbiosis involves a partnership between fungi and algae or cyanobacteria. The fungi provide a protective structure for the photosynthetic partner, while the algae or cyanobacteria produce sugars through photosynthesis that benefit both partners.
If you mean a symbiotic relationship, it is an ecological relationship where two creatures depend on one another for survival. However, sometimes the creatures choose to live among each other without the actual need for it. An example where creatures depend on each other is a clown fish in a sea anemone.
That would be the evolution of an exclusive symbiotic or parasitic relationship.
The four types of symbiotic relationships are mutualism, where both organisms benefit; commensalism, where one organism benefits while the other is unaffected; parasitism, where one organism benefits at the expense of the other; and competition, where both organisms are negatively affected by each other.
Commensalism is the weakest symbiotic attachment in which one species benefits while the other is neither helped nor harmed.
No, symbiotic animals rely on a close relationship with another species for survival, so they usually do not live solitary lives. They depend on their partner for resources or other benefits, and often have evolved specialized adaptations for this interdependence.
Symbiotic.
Two symbiotic relationships in wetlands are the relationship between the Egyptian Plover and the American Alligator. Another relationship is alga living off of lichens.
no they do not have any symbiotic relationships
A non-symbiotic relationship is one where both parties are not benefiting equally from the relationship. There are different types of non-symbiotic relationships, including parasitism, which is where one party takes from another without giving anything back.
A non-symbiotic relationship is one where both parties are not benefiting equally from the relationship. There are different types of non-symbiotic relationships, including parasitism, which is where one party takes from another without giving anything back.
No, not all symbiotic relationships involve harm. In mutualistic relationships, both species benefit from each other, while in commensalistic relationships, one species benefits without causing harm to the other. Harmful interactions can occur in some cases, such as in parasitic relationships where one species benefits at the expense of the other.
Koalas don't interact with other animals. Their closest relative is the ground based wombat, another Australian native species.
This question is really rhetorical, because commensalism is one of the symbiotic relationships between one animal species and another. Thus the question really answers itself: the symbiotic relationship between egret and cattle is commensalism.
I would think so because they are young or with another otter a long time, they hold paws to stay together as they travel to place to place.
Symbiotic
<3
Symbiotic