They can. The reason to avoid it is many fold. The strongest argument against is is that it increases the risk to the child for serious birth defects by 50%.
Having a child with birth defects is very hard on all persons involved. SO much worse if it was an AVOIDABLE risk.
Siblings not having sex is the best and safest for everybody, parents, children, and society. It's not a relationship that is healthy for anyone. Marriage is hard enough as it is. So is child raising. An non sexual relationship with siblings is so much better for all.
yes he did 4 brothers andd 5 sisters ask another question
Yes, Alexander Fleming had four siblings - two brothers and two sisters.
Zeus has 2 brothers Hades and Poseidon and he has other "kids"
No he only had brothers and sisters, no twin
Yes, he had several sisters, brothers, and half-brothers and sisters. His father, Hugh Fleming, married Grace Sterling and Grace was his mother. Seven children in all, Including Jane Fleming, Richard Fleming, and also his older brother Hugh Fleming.
separate them
None Mate
yes withouth a doubt
Yes they do. They don't know the difference. Refer to link below.
Brothers and sisters, of any species of animal, cannot breed.
He had 11 brothers and sisters.
If they are from different parents then they are not called brothers or sisters, but if they are from different parents then I suggest it's not allowed.
There are 4 brothers and 3 sister's all up. Assume your one of the brothers - hence you have 3 brothers and 3 sisters. However any one of your sisters, would have 4 brothers and 2 sisters.
no she has no brothers or sisters.
yes, 7 brothers and sisters
he had 2 brothers and 3 sisters
She had 12 brothers and sisters