Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.
i think, they will study what we did in life
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Artifacts are important to Historians (and Archaeologists) because they are actual evidence of past human activity. However fossils are NOT important to historians as they are too old, they ARE important to Geologists.
Historians use primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time period being studied, and secondary sources, which are interpretations or analyses of primary sources by other historians. Both types of evidence are important in constructing an accurate and comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
Artifacts are important to historians because they provide physical evidence of past cultures, societies, and events. They offer insights into how people lived, worked, and interacted in the past, helping historians to piece together a more comprehensive understanding of history. Artifacts also serve as tangible links to the past, allowing people to connect with and learn from previous generations.
The writings of contemporary historians.
Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.
i think, they will study what we did in life
The historical thinking skill of interpretation is important for historians because it allows them to analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions from historical evidence. By interpreting the past, historians can uncover different perspectives, gain insights into why events occurred, and make sense of complex historical narratives. This skill is crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful historical interpretations.
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.