This is completely true. Although the Dutch were the first to explore the coastline of the Australian continent, they did not colonise it. It was colonised by the British for two main reasons:
1. To expand the British empire, and prevent the French from gaining a foothold in the Australian continent or in that part of the Pacific. The British were at war with the French and seeking to colonise more lands in order to gain more power and influence.
2. To solve the problem of Britain's overcrowded prisons (a consequence of the Industrial Revolution) by establishing a new penal colony in a land which showed promise for eventually becoming self-supporting. Britain had been sending their excess prisoners to North America, but the American War of Independence put a stop to the practice. Following this, the English were no longer able to transport surplus prisoners who couldn't legally be executed to North America.
Australia remained a British colony from the time the First Fleet of convicts landed, in 1788, until Federation in 1901. Even then, it was still subject to British authority until the Australia Acts of 1986 completed Australia's path to independence.
In modern times the Anglo-Australians relations are quite close. The two share many cultural ties, including religion and language, as Australia was once a former british prison colony. The true relationship between Australia and England officially started in 1901 when six british territories federated to form the Commonwealth of Australia, a dominion in the British Empire. Since that time, the Australians have supported England in both WWI and WWII, and even today the United Kingdom is the second largest foreign investor in Australia, just as Australia is the seventh largest foreign investor in the United Kingdom.
While the British and American influence has played a major role in defining the shape of Australia that we know today, a number of other influences have contributed to the development of the Australian identity. As settlers in an unfamiliar land, the Australian identity was long bound to the stereotype of the tough, heroic bushman who fought to tame a difficult landscape. Australian values like 'mateship', 'fair go' and the 'Aussie battler' emerged as a result of this myth. Throughout the prosperous post-war years, however, a new Australian ideal emerged and Australians were thought to be part of a more laidback culture that enjoyed the 'good life'. As migrants moved to Australia over the decades, however, they introduced new stories, traditions and perspectives to Australian culture. The traditional concepts of an Australia as a British colony, or a land of struggling bush-dwellers, no longer seemed to fit with the diverse new reality of the society. As Indigenous peoples were finally acknowledged as the original owners of the land, the role of Indigenous values in the construction of a true Australian identity had also become apparent. As such, the Indigenous and migrant influence has intervened in the American and British effect on Australian culture. As Australian society adapted to changing cultural influences across the decades, whether they be British, American, Indigenous, Asian or European, the national identity continually evolved in response. In the face of globalisation, however, the future of Australia's unique national identity was increasingly challenged by the development of a global culture.
A. Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi led a revolution with peaceful demonstration. B. The British split India into two countries. C. The British gave one-fifth of India's land to Pakistan.
When that phrase was born it was really true. It meant if you looked at a globe of that time you could readily see British colonies or territories spread widely over the globe, so it was daytime in one or another of them all the time. This vast empire disintegrated in the first half of the twenty century. It's technically true today but only because of a handful of people
Yes its true. The British fought against the Americans in the War of Independance. There were many loyalists in the Colonies too who fought for the King
Georgia
true (: actually the answer is false
If this is from study I then the answer is -They were originally aligned with the British, but they later fought against the British.
No, all Austrailians are not criminals. The country was colonized by the British, who decided at that time to create a penal colony there, so the original immigrants to that country from England were criminals, but it is not longer a British penal colony!!
In modern times the Anglo-Australians relations are quite close. The two share many cultural ties, including religion and language, as Australia was once a former british prison colony. The true relationship between Australia and England officially started in 1901 when six british territories federated to form the Commonwealth of Australia, a dominion in the British Empire. Since that time, the Australians have supported England in both WWI and WWII, and even today the United Kingdom is the second largest foreign investor in Australia, just as Australia is the seventh largest foreign investor in the United Kingdom.
No. Johnny Depp is American and Rowling stipulated that the films were to have an all-British cast.
true
True :)
true
true
It was not a success as a trading colony.
True - Isaac =]