There shouldn't be severe recoil with a Browning A5. Check the friction rings and make sure they are set for the correct loads: Light vs Heavy Loads. If the friction rings are set for light loads, and you are shooting high brass, then it will kick harder than it needs to be.
Identifies the barrel as suitable for modern loads.
The gun is probably set for heavy loads with the friction rings, and the loads are too light. Remove the forend. Inside the wood forearm may be a diagram to show how the bevels and brass friction ring should be set for light vs heavy loads. If no diagram, go to Browning .com and there you can find a diagram, but remember to find the Mag 12, it is different from a standard A-5. When shooting heavy 3" loads, set the rings to heavy. When shooting 2 3/4 lighter loads set for light.
You need to consult with a gunsmith.
100-600 USD
Sometimes, in the old days, sheep would carry heavy loads.
They made it possible to haul heavy loads cheaply.
Loads that carry more shot and powder.
This is usually due to the friction rings on the magazine tube set for heavy loads. They need to be adjusted for light loads. Unscrew & remove the magazine cap to remove forearm and barrel. The friction ring and bevels will be exposed. Adjust to match the diagram. Here is the Browning link below to show how they should be set depending on light or heavy loads. Recommend you print it out. You can also reduce the diagram and glue it on the inside of the forearm.
One of the causes is that shooters shoot heavy loads when the friction ring and collar are set for lighter loads. This puts heavier pressure on the receiver when fired; It also increases felt recoil. It can't be completely avoided. Over time with enough shooting they will crack. Be sure the rings are set for Heavy loads or light loads depending. When set for the heavy loads, a lighter load won't eject, but a heavy load will when set for a light load ( the beveled collar is up against the receiver)
they changed america by carrying big and heavy loads to different places
The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.The Romans used oxen for hauling heavy loads. Although oxen were slower than mules, they were hardier and stronger and could pull heavy loads such as military siege equipment.