It depends. If you're more of a multiplayer guy, go with Modern Warfare 2. It has a hard-to-follow storyline, frustrating Special Ops, but its multiplayer is a huge step ahead of World at War. World at War somewhat has a better plot, and it has Nazi Zombies. The problem with Zombies is that it gets stale after playing Nacht der Untoten over and over again. You'll have to buy the DLC with Der Riese to truly satisfy your zombie gaming needs. Plus, if you're a PC gamer, it's really fun to make your own custom maps, although I don't know how.
Modern Warfare 2 no doubt about it.....i acctully have both and the graphics of world at war just suck compared to modern warfare 2
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was just before Call of Duty: World At War, and Modern Warfare 2 came just after it. Unless its on the Wii, on the Wii its WaW the Modern Warfare but its called Modern Warfare Reflex
No. CoD World and War and CoD Modern Warfare are though.
no only in cod5 (world at war)
No, it was not set in the time of World War 2. It was set in the time of around 2000.
No there are World at War then Modern Warfare 2 then Black Ops and on November 8 2011 Modern Warfare 3
Call of Duty World at War, Modern Warfare, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops, and Modern Warfare 3 all have online multiplayer.
Modern Warfare 2 is a better game if you are going to play online.
Nazi Zombies is exclusive in Call of Duty World at War. In Modern warfare 2 the enemy isn't Nazis.
Warfare in World War 2 are illegal and dangerous than warfare in World War 1.
World at war was the next release, but you could also get Black Ops or Modern Warfare 2 and on November 8 2011 Modern Warfare 3
Solomon Jayatissa