No because a myth is something that has not been stated as a true fact unlike legends. A good example of a mythological person is Robin Hood , it is said that he stole from the rich to give the poor , but its never been made to an true fact that Robin hood ever existed whilst a person like Martin Luther king is a legend , people have witnessed his existence.
Basically Legends are for real and Myth are something that has gone from one mouth to another.
The Shoshone legends are myths that are true.
Prophecy in the News - 2008 True Legends was released on: USA: 26 August 2013
It is unproven, so it could be true.
Nope. That is if you are true to the Legends.
Mostly True Stories Urban Legends Revealed - 2002 was released on: USA: 2002
A legend is a story that is perceived to be true by the listeners and the teller. Events are usually possible, but legends can include miracles.
Some urban legends do have their roots in things that actually happened. See related links for stories.
Fables and legends are from a different source. Fables are made up to express a point or moral. Legends have origins that may or may not have been true but are usually embellishments of the truth to emphasize the meaning of the story. So the answer to fables is no. Legends? Maybe.
Mostly True Stories Urban Legends Revealed - 2002 1-5 was released on: USA: November 2004
Legends abound, which are impossible to verify.
House of Buggin' - 1995 Totally True Urban Legends 1-6 was released on: USA: 26 February 1995
Urban legends are not true. Urban legends are stories that have been past on from generation to generation. They consist of myth and sometimes horror. The term "urban" is used to differentiate modern legend from traditional folklore in pre-industrial times and does not refer to an urban area. This is a term that has been used since 1968. The most common Internet source of debunking "urban legends" is snopes.com.