The United States had just won a very expensive war for independence and already owed much to their new ally, the French. Foreign entanglements threatened to complicate an already complicated financial question. Also, the new country was relatively small and weak and would not be wise to become involved in the warring affairs of large wealthy European nations. Foreign policy was best made simple by neutrality. Washington was prophetic in this way. It was alliances and arms races that caused multiple European wars in the 19th century and World War I.
No
He remains neutral on the subject.
Andrew Jackson served two terms as US President (1829 to 1837). It wasn't possible for George Washington to support Jacksonian policies, as Washington died 14 December 1799, thirty years before Jackson became President.
give or take, most people were neutral and didnt want to get involved
No Because the President have to go to the bathroom.
george washington
George Washington
A fifth of the population was actively treasonous. A third opposed, a third in support a third neutral.
good job
One decision was whether or not to support the French Revolution, I believe.
George Washington's vice president during both of his terms was John Adams. Adams served from 1789 to 1797, playing a key role in the early formation of the United States government. As vice president, he was instrumental in providing support and counsel to Washington, while also fulfilling duties in the Senate. Adams later became the second president of the United States after Washington's two terms.
They like to report or write on things that either support the president because he's going favors for them or either because people have their own political views and we are never neutral so this biasness in the mind is spilled out when one writes the newspaper coverages of the president. No one can remain completely neutral.