Yes, it is true.
Better then in the south
After slavery some blacks were already in Canada and the north, although some did stay in the south.
Tactics are the small decisions that concern a battle. Strategy is the larger plan affecting a whole war or campaign. Bad tactics for the south were frontal attacks versus entrenched troops. I feel it is their strategies that failed them (outdated Napoleonic warfare in a modern age).
segregation in the south means that the blacks and the whites were separated by their skin color and being judged by it
tHIS QUESTION IS A LOADED ONE. LIKE ASKING IF WHITES THINK THEY WILL STILL BE ABLE TO OPPRESS BLACKS AT WILL.
as we see in antilbellium history the original purspose of the KKK was to oppress blacks and maintain white supremcy but suck them wiggers.
in the 1860's there was 1253 blacks in the south
Slave codes restricted the rights and freedoms of free blacks by imposing limitations on their movement, occupation, and ability to testify in court. They also reinforced the racial hierarchy and served to further marginalize and oppress free blacks in society.
No, most blacks did not leave the south after the civil war.
Many blacks did fight in the south but not as much as blacks in the north. Blacks in the south that fought were either free land owners and were fighting to keep their land, or they were slaves of owners who were drafted in the war and they fought alongside their owners.
The south lost the civil war
The Spanish tactics was to hold the ball and keep passing it.
Do not oppress the poor. How did the king oppress the farmers?
destroy the railroads.
they were able to vote.
Too many.