It was taxation without representation through parliament it was about taxation without representation through parliament
I'm not sure if this is the one you looking for but "Taxation without Representation"
The taxation to the colonists. Britain said that they could do that because they were in charge of everything that happened in their territory. The colonists said that they could not be taxed because there was no representation in Britain's Parliament.
The harsh taxes put on the colonist after the French and Indian War. the British needed a way to pay for their war debts so the taxed the colonist heavily. No taxation without representation. And the King of England (George III) didn't listen to them.
The Stamp Act infuriated the American colonists. It imposed a tax on most paper documents and was seen as another example of taxation without representation.
"No taxation without representation."
to be short, heavy taxation
"The Boston Tea Party was caused by the colonist revolt over taxation without representation."
If the colonist hade lost the war their taxation would go up.
Taxation without representation
Taxation without representation
"No taxation without representation"
The Stamp act was unfair to the colonist because the colonist were being taxed by Parliament without any saying in the taxation. Ergo, "No taxation without Representation!" the colonist just wanted to be represented. Also because it was the Britishs' fault for being in debt because of the french and Indian war. not the colonists'
IMO, no.
"No taxation without representation!"
No taxation without representation.
"No taxation without representation".