dildo
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
The acquisition of vast new lands from Mexico, and the fierce debate over which of these should be slave-states and which ones should be free soil.
Because of the enormous new territories acquired from Mexico. These extended so far either side of the Missouri line that the Missouri Compromise was not workable. This intensified the debate over new territories joining the Union as slave-states.
Because of the enormous new territories acquired from Mexico. These extended so far either side of the Missouri line that the Missouri Compromise was not workable. This intensified the debate over new territories joining the Union as slave-states.
The issue was whether each of the new Western states would be admitted to the Union as a slave-state or free soil.
dildo
dildo
New York and new jersey. Because there was debate over which state owned it.
dildo
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
Fierce debate over which of the new states could be slave-states and which could be free soil.
The slavery debate was mostly to do with the new states - whether they would be slave or free, the proportion of slave-states in Congress, and their influence on the voting.
I.do not now lalalala ok so better keep it learning those study
In the 1850s, Australia did not have states: it had colonies.The colonies wereNew South WalesVictoriaVan Diemen's Land (the name was changed to Tasmania in 1856)South AustraliaWestern AustraliaQueensland separated from New South Wales and became a colony of its own in 1859.
The debate was over when the US Constitution was submitted to the various states for ratification and when nine of the 13 approved it they had the required two-thirds majority.
No debate, it is illegal by NM and Federal laws