It made the government re look the Missouri Compromise. When they revisited it they found that outlawing slavery in a certain area was unconstitutional and they repealed it. they hoped to put an end to the disputing going on about slavery, it obviously did not stop for long...
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
Dred Scott decision
The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
In the Supreme Court.
No