That Scott had no right to argue in court
2nd Amendment.
Quite a variety of 'good subjects to argue about' can be found in regard to 'anti-federalist and federalist' matters. Put in question-form, two of the most important (and controversial) are the following: First, at what point does federal power move from 'reasonable' to 'tyrannical'? Second, do states have the right to secede from the Union?
To fight the racist idea that Africans were primitive
debate is the way to argue about FACS!!! it is not mindlessly argueing about stupid stuff with no where to go. its about proving your opoin to the other person. "IM RIGHT YOUR WRONG" says Daniel malek the coolist kid ever. this is an excellent example
because it is always right
Sometimes people do have to be right ,take it from me it's best not to argue.
If you always argue, then perhaps you are not right for each other.
They like to be right or they feel a sense of insecurity.
Bob and Rosie insisted that they were not arguing, only having a discussion. He was arrested for arguing with the state police.
it is basically just a fact of life and if we don't argue it wouldn't be right
People argue for many different reasons. Some can be about money or to marriage. Also, family member argue because they don't agree with each other and they both think they are right.
Yes, but only when he thinks he's right.
he was right
criminals do no not deserve to have rights
Because your pride may take over because you know or think your right
The right of the government to use warrantless surveillance against terrorism