answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

During colonial times, the colonies had no representation in Parliament. They had no members in either the House of Lords or the House of Commons. Their only presence in England before the Revolution was Benjamin Franklin who was there, not as a member of Parliament, but as a representative of only Pennsylvania to promote Pennsylvania's economic interests. Later on, some but not all colonies hired him to represent their interests in England as well. But in doing so he was looked upon as a representative of all colonies.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Colonial representation in parliament
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In what ways was democracy limited in Colonial America?

Democracy was limited in colonial America because of the colonial system. The people in the colonies had no right to representation in the English Parliament.


What did virtual representation mean for the colonies?

Virtual representation was a scapegoat to let Parliament tax the colonies even though the colonies couldn't elect members for Parliament. It meant Britain could tax the colonies without colonial representation.


The English responded to colonial complaints against taxation without representation by asserting?

Each member of Parliament virtually represented all the citizens


What was the reason colonist want independence from England?

Number one reason was lack of representation in Parliament, which created no home control over Colonial administration. Sheryl Graham-Shockley


Why did the colonist feel that the law passed by Parliament violated their rights?

The colonists felt that the tax laws should be passed only by their colonial representation. "No taxation without representation" became a rallying cry of the colonists.


How did King James shut down colonial assembly?

He believed the colonies were represented by "virtual representation" in Parliament already. So, they did not need their own assemblies.


The argument between great Britain and American colonies during the 1760s and 1770s over virtual representation concerned?

Parliament's ability to reflect colonial interest


Colonial protesters of the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act rallied around what famous political slogan?

"No Taxation Without Representation!" and "Taxation Without Representation is Tyranny!" Both were essentially nonsense; if the colonies did get representation in Parliament, it would have been just a few seats (going by relative population), and they would have been consistently outvoted in colonial matters.


Colonial protesters of the Stamp Act and Sugar Act rallied around what famous political slogan?

"No Taxation Without Representation!" and "Taxation Without Representation is Tyranny!" Both were essentially nonsense; if the colonies did get representation in Parliament, it would have been just a few seats (going by relative population), and they would have been consistently outvoted in colonial matters.


What is a representative colony?

A colonial representative is a person elected or selected by the voters in that colony, or selected by the colonial legislature (assembly) to represent the interests of the colonists in the colonial government. The Parliament of Great Britain is the legislative branch of the British government. In the years prior to the American Revolution, the colonists complained that they did not have any representation in the Parliament, therefor Parliament had no legal right to enact laws for the colonies, with the exception of regulating trade. The Parliament answered that the colonies had virtual representation because Parliament (the House of Lords and the House of Commons) represented the entire empire, not any specific area of the British Empire. MrV


No taxation without representation was a response to no representation in?

Parliament


What did the argument between great Britain and its American colonies between the 1760s and 1770s over virtual representation concern?

Parliament's ability to reflect colonial assemblies.