In North America, hit and run tactics; guerrilla warfare.
Tactics are the small decisions that concern a battle. Strategy is the larger plan affecting a whole war or campaign. Bad tactics for the south were frontal attacks versus entrenched troops. I feel it is their strategies that failed them (outdated Napoleonic warfare in a modern age).
False neither side was prepared to fight a war of this magnitude. Both sides had to draft hundred's of thousands of Men to fight the war. Medical supplies were in short supply along with trained medical teams. Many units had to fight with outdated weaponry like smooth bore cannons and flintlock muskets. Tactics hadn't evolved along with the new weaponry. The same tactics were being used in the Napoleonic wars. So no the north and south were not prepared for a war.
World War 2 diseases I am not familiar with, but the Spanish flu was an epidemic around the world at the end of World War 1.
WW2
World War I was fought by trench warfare.
theres no technology in world war 1 lol :)
Stephen Bull has written: 'Infantry tactics of the Second World War' -- subject(s): History, World War, 1939-1945, Tactics, Infantry, Tank warfare, Campaigns, Equipment, Antitank weapons, Infantry drill and tactics 'World War II street-fighting tactics' 'World War One' -- subject(s): Equipment and supplies, Great Britain, Great Britain. Army, History, Uniforms, World War, 1914-1918
Smash thru obstacles.
well besides from their RUBBISH tactics they did nothing
Their main tactic was Blitzkreig.
that is why technology and tactics had there own purposes in world war 1
was this in world war 1 or 2?
The Australian War Cabinet.
The war in Europe was a land war. The war in the Pacific was a naval war.
they smokin hot!
Scream aim and fire!