The simplistic answer is based on images of slaves being beaten by 'bad masters" in the Southern United States presented in many movoes. In reality slaves have been kept and are being kept in many places around the world and in almost all cases a portion of them try to escape even if they are treated reasonably well (Slaves were valuable "tools" on a farm or business and would not be "broken" for no reason). This is similar to prisoners who try to escape even though they may be in minimum security prisons where their treatment is as good as many people who live on the outside. It is generally felt this is due to the desire to not be property and to chose where and when the person himself goes and when he can do it. As an example, in Twain's "Huckleberry Finn" the slave Jim tries to escape, not because he is mistreated, but because he wants to be reunited with his family.
women were also raped by their master
Women were often used as a machine to create more slaves for the owner thus giving them more money because slaves cost a lot before
Jefferson Davis
no because some were afraid tht they would get caught trying to help the run away slaves
No. Lincoln detested slavery, but did nothing about it; his sole goal was to preserve the union. He believed that ANYTHING that would preserve the union and prevent the confederacy from seceding was proper to do. Lincoln himself wrote that if he could preserve the union by freeing all the slaves, he would do so; if he could preserve the union by not freeing ANY slaves he would do so, and that if he could preserve the union by freeing some slaves and not freeing others, he would do THAT. Which is what he did. The Emancipation Proclamation freed only the slaves within the Confederacy; it did not free any slaves within the areas controlled by the North.
somewhat. it was supposed to, and it mostly did, but in some southern states they still had some trouble freeing their slaves. hope this helped!
Both were for freedom
Abraham Lincoln said this quoteMy paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that......
Slaves were afraid of running away due to harsh consequences like physical punishment, capture, and potential death if caught. They were often separated from their families and communities, making escape difficult and risky. Additionally, slaves had limited knowledge of the outside world and uncertain prospects for survival without support.
they were both treated harshly, the difference was; the owners of black slaves in the us made babies with slave women to increase the amount of slaves needed to work on the other hand the egyptians were afraid of the growth of their slave population, they were afraid they would join their enemies and fight against them so they tried to work them to death and also killed some of them.
Some white people did not want to help the slaves because they were afraid of being persecuted, they agreed with slavery or they were disinterested by the idea of slavery and therefore felt no need to help slaves. However, the answer depends on what you mean by 'help the slaves'. Because it could denote fighting against slavery or helping slaves escape.
The abolitionists attempted to bring about the end of slavery in the United States by protesting, freeing slaves in the south, and bringing the issue to votes in local and state legislatures. <><><> In addition, some, such as John Brown, encouraged slaves to revolt and kill their masters.
The law provided guidelines and processes for freeing slaves, whether they were black or of another race. Some individuals may have found it easier to free black slaves due to societal attitudes or personal motivations towards racial equality. However, the legal process itself did not differentiate based on race.
The abolitionists in the North wanted an end to slavery. In order to keep you from false assumptions, let me remind you that the answer is NOT Abraham Lincoln. Contrary to what they teach you in Elementary school, he was not an abolitionist. Lincoln's goal at the start of the US Civil War was to save the union of the North and the South whether that meant freeing slaves or not. "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that." -Abraham Lincoln NEW RESPONDENT Even in the south the most educated and enlightened classes wished an end to slavery but not with coercive methods that would be counterproductive for the economy and public policy. They sustained a gradual and orderly emancipation of the slaves who, after their release, should be helped to play a role in civil society or to emigrate.