In order to win in the electoral college, a majority is required. There is no such thing as a minority winner there. If no one gets a majority, the House of Representatives elects the President from the three top vote-getters. Every state gets one vote. If they choose a candidate with a minority of the votes, the result would probably be just as controversial as when a person with a plurality of popular votes loses in the electoral college.
the possibility of electing a minority presidentthe risk of so-called "faithless" Electors,the possible role of the Electoral College in depressing voter turnout, andits failure to accurately reflect the national popular will.
Those who object to the Electoral College system generally do so on three grounds:the possibility of electing a minority presidentthe risk of so-called "faithless" Electors, andits failure to accurately reflect the national popular will.Opponents of the Electoral College are disturbed by the possibility of electing a minority president (one without the absolute majority of popular votes). One way in which a minority president could be elected is if the country were so deeply divided politically that three or more presidential candidates split the electoral votes among them such that no one obtained the necessary majority. This occurred in 1824 when John Quincy Adams was elected President despite the fact that Andrew Jackson received the most popular votes. Should that happen today, there are two possible resolutions: either one candidate could throw his electoral votes to the support of another (as happened in 1824 when Henry Clay threw his support to Adams) or else, absent an absolute majority in the Electoral College, the U.S. House of Representatives would select the president in accordance with the 12th Amendment. Either way, though, the person taking office would not have obtained the absolute majority of the popular vote.
A minority president is a president that gets elected with less than 50% of the popular vote. Abe Lincoln was a minority president, for example.
The first minority President is President Barack Obama. He is half African American and Caucasian. Most people refer to him as African American.
Congressional leadership is a follows: House of Representative: Speaker of the House Majority Leader Minority Leader Majority Whip Minority Whip Senate: President of the Senate (vice president of the U. S.) Majority Leader Minority Leader President pro tempore of the Senate Assistant Majority Leader (Majority Whip) Assistant Minority Leader (Minority Whip)
Some people refer to the current US President, Barack Obama as a minority President because he is of his Afro American heritage. Even though his mother is considered a "white" person, it does not matter. This is because never has a US President had a dual heritage, thus "minority" is still a logical term to use.
pie
Because he was Indonesian.
President of the Senate. (Vice President) President Pro Tempore Majority Leader Assistant Majority Leader (Majority Whip) Minority Leader Aissitant Minority Leader (Minority Whip) comment from cm512:::: i asked this question back wen i was a sophomore in high school... in 2011
No- Washigton was not considered to be a member of a minority. He was of English ancestry like most of the people in the country.
If the President of the United States is a member of the minority party his effectiveness becomes weaker. The policies set forth by the President are going to be challenged more often if there is only a minority rule in Congress.
he received less than 50% of the popular votes cast in the 1912 elections