0
Why is the ideology of individual justices so important in explaining how justices decide cases?
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are justices who are obligated to rule according to the ideology of the president who appointed them?
No. Not at all. Justices make no promises when they are appointed and they are on their own once they are on the job. Some have been a great surprise with their views once they got on the court.
Why is political ideology so important when presidents are appointing justices?
The Supreme Court has no real checks. Its members serve for life and can make bizarre interpretations of the Constitution that essentially create laws that can not be repealed unless reversed by a later court.
What is US Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy's ideology?
He is a conservative Republican but sometimes sides with the more liberal wing of the Supreme Court.
Major shifts in the supreme court's position have usually been due to what?
Major shifts in opinions result from Presidents appointing justices whose ideology and approach to constitutional interpretation differs from the majority on the court. The Supreme Court's decisions generally reflect the ideology of the majority, and this changes over time.
Are the justices on the US Supreme Court Democrat or Republican?
US Supreme Court justices do not advertise their party affiliation because they're not supposed to consider partisan ideology when making decisions. Unfortunately, in the real world, ideology plays a major role in constitutional interpretation and decision-making. The current Court leans toward conservatism: five justices were appointed by Republican Presidents and often support the Republican agenda; four were appointed by Democratic Presidents and typically support a more liberal agenda. Sonia Sotomayor, one of President Barack Obama's Supreme Court appointees, has stated she's registered as an Independent.
Is the US Supreme Court divided into political parties?
Not officially. The US Supreme Court is supposed to be de-politicized, which is one of the primary reasons justices are appointed for life and insulated from concerns about partisan politics and elections. Supreme Court justices are human, however, and each has his or her own personal ideology that conforms more or less closely to the ideology of a particular political party. Conservative justices are currently more likely to be Republican, while progressive justices are more likely to be Democrat. Suzanna Sherry has written an intelligent article, "Influence and Independence: Role of Politics in Court Decisions," posted at america.gov, that addresses the involvement of political opinion in Supreme Court decisions. Please see Related Links, below. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is Stephen Breyer's ideology?
Stephen Breyer's ideology with regards to the judiciary is that legal interpretation should be less literal on the language being used and more intuitive as to the intent of the law when it was written. He has been an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States since 1994.
What 5 things can Congress not do?
they cannot make laws for individual states They House of Representatives do not appoint or approve Supreme Court Justices.
How are the superme cout justices chosen?
at the time of election for new justices the president nominates the justices and the senate approves the nominated justices.
There are justices on the supreme courthow mean justices on the supreme court are there?
there are about how mean justices on the Supreme Court.
Why is civility so important for the appearance of justice and propriety in your courts?
justices are supposed to be concerned only with constitutional issues, not partisan politics. So civility and respect for any justices opinion is required, not partisan politics.
How does Samuel Alito normally vote?
Justice Samuel Alito typically favors big business over individuals, and supports standard conservative ideology. He consistently votes with Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and (usually, but not always) Kennedy.
