OMG its so HOT...im in alternative school! && for our P3 we gotta go walk the Baseball feild && its SOOO HOTTT!!!! i am DIEING!! && i needa text my bestiee back..this guy is stalkin me omg its crazzyyy oh well my last day in here us FRIDAYYYY <3456 && ive been in here for 13 MUTHAF*CKKKINN DAYSS!! oh && btw im 15 && a girl <3456
OMG its so HOT...im in alternative school! && for our P3 we gotta go walk the Baseball feild && its SOOO HOTTT!!!! i am DIEING!! && i needa text my bestiee back..this guy is stalkin me omg its crazzyyy oh well my last day in here us FRIDAYYYY <3456 && ive been in here for 13 MUTHAF*CKKKINN DAYSS!! oh && btw im 15 && a girl <3456
Yes, if appropriate precedents exist for the case before the court. The US Supreme Court sets binding precedents, meaning lower courts are required to adhere to them (but don't always do so) under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
Precedents are important because they provide consistency and predictability in legal decision-making. They help ensure fair treatment by allowing similar cases to be treated similarly. Precedents also help establish and maintain the rule of law by providing guidance for future cases and promoting stability in the legal system.
they are impotant becuz they help us change the world if its bad and they make it a better place.
In the Supreme Court, the written decision and legal reasoning for a case is called an Opinion.
It is important to remember your values when making a decision as otherwise, the decision you make will not help you as it will not be based around your life.
Cost concept for Decision making ?
why is demand estimation and forecast important for managerial decision making
The US Supreme Court generally tries to adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: let the decision stand), which attempts to impose some consistency and uniformity over decisions. Stare decisis requires precedents (earlier decisions) that are similar enough to assist in determining the outcome of the instant case under review.There are no hard rules for reversing a previous Supreme Court decision or a lower court decision. Beyond precedents, justices also rely on their own interpretations, their personal ideologies, changing social conditions, intervening laws and (on occasion) amendments, compelling arguments, and various other factors when making a decision.So, no, there is no test. Any case the Supreme Court grants certiorari is worthy of being considered independently, on the basis of its own uniqueness.
to prevent supreme arrogance, you need to know the whole situation before making any decision.
Brennan has written several books on leadership, management, and decision-making. He is known for his insights on how individuals can improve their decision-making processes and enhance their leadership skills.
to know if the project can be executed or not. its the window opener to help ensure that the resources are available.
because it is