There would be no case in the first place. All courts would follow the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States. The only thing the Supreme Court has allowed is for the states to say it is too late for an abortion when any part of a live baby has been born. The states can define the point of birth. Any appeal court would throw any decision to the contrary back to the trial court.
The appellant's case in Roe v. Wade, which was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, would collapse if the Court had found that the right to privacy does not include a woman's right to have an abortion. Alternatively, if the Court had upheld the Texas law that criminalized abortions except to save the life of the mother, the appellant's case would have collapsed. However, the Court ultimately ruled in favor of Roe, establishing that the constitutional right to privacy protects a woman's right to choose to have an abortion.
Charles Woolmer has written: 'La pelea' 'Charles Woolmer and John Sympson gent. appellants. Richard Markes, respondent. The appellants case'
Richard Gee has written: 'Richard Gee, Esq; and Phillippa his wife, ... appellants. Edwin Lewis ... Edward, Earl of Jersey, and ... his wife, ... and William Blackway, ... Respondents. The appellants case'
John Hepburn has written: 'John, James, George, and Anne Hepburn, and their tutor in litem - - - - - appellants. Charles Congalton, and others, - - - respondents. Et e contra. The appellants case'
Archibald Primrose Rosebery has written: 'Archibald Primrose, Lord Viscount Roseberie ... and ... his wife. Appellants. James Taylor, Elizabeth his wife, and Samuel Tireman, respondents. The appellants case. ..'
what cause the collapse of hedge fund in this case
Charles Cajetan Leslie has written: 'Charles Cajetan Count Leslie, and Anthony Leslie of Balquhain, - appellants. Peter Grant, and David Orme writer in Edinburgh his tutor ad litem, respondents. The appellants case'
Roe v. Wade was a civil case; no crime was committed.
it discusses how roe wanted to abort and wade was against it but it would violate the 4th amendment and basically it discussed the issues of abortion
I am not sure what you are asking. If you are in fact, asking the name of the case, it IS Roe versus Wade.
Mark Wilson has written: 'Appeal from the Court of Chancery in Ireland. Mark Wilson, gentleman, and Susanna Wilson, spinster, Catherine Mottley and Elinor Mottley, infants, by their guardian Joseph Verschoyle, -------- appellants. Thomas Bayly and Catherine his wife, ---- respondents. The case of the appellants, Mar'
Texas.
Roe v. Wade, (1973) was a civil case so there was no defendant. The nominal respondent, Henry B. Wade, was the District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas. Wade was named because of the office he occupied; the real "defendant" would have been the State of Texas, but states have immunity from being sued (per the Eleventh Amendment).The consequence of the decision was that the Texas anti-abortion law was overturned. There were no known personal consequences for Henry Wade or anyone else on the respondent side of the case.Case Citation:Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973)