Bakke vs University of California in 1978. It got rid of racial quotas, but affirmative action remains in place today.
There is no specific term for this action. Some may refer to affirmative action as "reverse discrimination", but that's not a legal term, nor a legal concept.
Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
A governmental action that denies someone fair and equal treatment under the law may be declared unconstitutional. A judge can evaluate a law and declare that it is unconstitutional.
supreme court jsut a guess
University of Michigan case
A governmental action that denies someone fair and equal treatment under the law may be declared unconstitutional. A judge can evaluate a law and declare that it is unconstitutional.
University of California v. Bakke
If the US Supreme Court declares an Executive Order (Presidential action) unconstitutional, it is checking the Executive Branch.
Democratic views on affirmative action vary, but most Democrats support it as a means to promote equality and diversity. They believe that affirmative action is necessary to address historical disadvantages faced by marginalized groups, and it helps to create a more inclusive and equitable society. Democrats generally argue that affirmative action policies should be implemented to ensure equal opportunities in education, employment, and other areas.
Should treat everyone equally.
Unconstitutional
Affirmative action is about farming