Assuming you are speaking about the US presidential primary, the difference between delegates and superdelegates are the pledges of their votes in the primary. A delegate must vote ON THE FIRST ROUND OF VOTING the way that state's political party designates that vote. On subsequent votes, a delegate can vote any way he or she pleases. For example, in Delaware Obama won nine of 23 Democratic Party delegates and Clinton won six. On the FIRST ROUND OF VOTING IN THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL NOMINATING CONVENTION ONLY, Delaware will vote at least nine votes for Obama and at least six votes for Clinton. There are still eight delegates outstanding (23 - [9 + 6]) and they are superdelegates. A superdelegate is not pledged to any delegate, even on the first round. In Delaware, seven of the superdelegates are party officials and one is unnamed. -jt
sb
sb
Deciding the delegates
California has 55 electors.
OBAMA =)
552 total, include alternate deligates
The delegates counts are the numbers of electors each candidate gets on election night. Both are trying to get 270.
Fourthteenth
Senators+Representatives=Electors, so; 2+32=34
The people who elect the president make up the Electoral College and are called electors. Each state has the same number of electors as it has senators and representatives (there are two senators from each state, but the number of representatives depends on the population of the state in the most recent census). The District of Columbia, isn't a state, but it has three electors. The left column in the link provided shows the number of electors by state for many states. I don't know why it doesn't show them all.
Delegates value the opinion of their electors back home rather than their own personal beliefs.
In a direct primary you vote for people running to be their party's nominee. In an indirect primary, you vote for electors or delegates who will later select the party's nominee.