In response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v Georgia that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee, President Jackson disregarded the decision and removal of the Cherokee proceeded as planned.
no
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)
It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. (APEX)