0
What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What Supreme Court decision in effect meant the Constitution protected slavery?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
What supreme court decision in effect meant that the constitution protected?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
This decision protected slavery in the constitution?
The decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case declared that the Constitution protected property - and that slaves were property. Simple as that. This could be taken to mean that no state could be officially free soil - the issue in the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates, which first brought Lincoln to nationwide notice.
What decision was by the Supreme Court to end slavery?
The Supreme Court did not decide to end slavery. Slavery was formally abolished in the United States with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865.
What was the dred Scott decision and how do you think the north and south reacted to the decision?
By declaring that the Constitution protected slavery throughout the USA, the Supreme Court drove the two sides further apart, and helped to bring war closer.
Why were most southerner's pleases with the dred Scott decision?
Because it said slavery was protected by the Constitution.
How The Dred Scott Decision affect slavery?
The Supreme Court denied Scott his freedom on the grounds that slavery was protected by the Constitution. (They judged that the Founding Fathers would have included slaves in their definition of 'property' - which was declared sacred under the Constitution.) This decision infuriated the influential Abolitionists in the North, as much as it delighted the South, and deepened the division between the two sections.
Why did the Dred Scott decision anger Northern lawmakers and abolitionists?
Because the Supreme Court said that slavery was protected by the Constitution. So in theory, the new territories could not vote to become free-soil States.
The Dred Scott decision on the issue of slavery upheld the Southern viewpoint that?
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
What development during the 1850s caused northerners to fear that slavery would spread throughout the western territories?
The decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case that the Constitution protected a man's property, including slave property.
What power of the Constitution justified the actions of the southern states prior to the Civil War?
The Supreme Court's decision that slavery enjoyed total protection by the Constitution.
Was the abolition of slavery a US Supreme Court decision?
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
