Baker v. Carr (1962) and Shaw v. Reno (1993) are both landmark Supreme Court cases in the realm of redistricting. Baker v. Carr established the principle of "one person, one vote" which requires states to draw legislative districts with equal populations. Shaw v. Reno further clarified that race cannot be the predominant factor in drawing districts, setting limits on racial gerrymandering.
Baker v. Carr (redistricting is a justiciable issue) Westbury v. Sanders (one man, one vote) Shaw v. Reno (race can't be only consideration in redistricting)
V A. Shaw has written: 'Effective computerization in quantity surveying'
V J. Shaw has written: 'CNC tooling database'
Tracy Shaw Salsacise - 2001 V is rated/received certificates of: UK:E
Renata V. Shaw has written: 'Picture searching' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Catalogs, Illustrated books, Pictures
Bernard V Shaw has written: 'Reports on the Kimberley police and detective department' -- subject(s): Detectives, Police
It was the first time that the Supreme Court was able to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional.
True
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9acI8EWNqzg
The US Supreme Court believes "political questions" are appropriate issues for Congress, not the judiciary; however, they have ruled on certain cases regarding political redistricting (Baker v. Carr, (1962)) and racial gerrymandering (Shaw v. Reno, (1993), Miller v. Johnson, (1995)), where the legislature failed to address, or improperly addressed, issues that resulted in constitutional rights violations.