Hamilton was loose, whereas Jefferson was strict in interpreting the Constitution.
About Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson
Henry against Hamilton for
Jefferson's views differed from Hamilton's because Jefferson believed that implied powers are the powers that are "absolutely necessary" to carry out expressed powers, but Hamilton thought it meant that they were not expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
Hamilton thought that iy was good but had some flaws and jefferson thought it wasnt a good idea at first
Hamilton's objection to Jefferson's strict interpretation of the Constitution
Hamilton lead the federalist (people for the constitution) while Jefferson lead the anti-federalist (people against the constitution or believed that the constitution did not fully protect the rights of the citizens). It was a battle of federalist vs anti-federalist.
In general, the views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton on the application of the Constitution were quite different. In The Bank Debate, the Constitutionality of banks were argued. Jefferson believed in Strict Construction, meaning that if the Constitution didn't directly say something, then they couldn't do it, such as banks, which were not included in the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, on the other hand, believed in Loose Construction, which meant that if the Constitution doesn't say they can't do something, they can. So to Hamilton, banks were Constitutional because they weren't mentioned in the Constitution; for Jefferson banks were unconstitutional for the same reason.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.