He should not have been king because he was already king of Norway.
It was William duke of Norway
i think yes
he is the conquror of Norway and king of englad
i think king William
William should not be king because he never knew about the country and he wasn't related to the king.
Norway have both a queen and a king, King Harald V of Norway and Queen Sonja of Norway.
Harald V is the King for Norway.
The King of Norway is HM King Harald 5th. The Prime Minister of Norway is Jens Stoltenberg.
No. Harald Hardrada (Harald III) was the Norwegian king who invaded England in 1066 and was killed fighting the English king Harold Godwinson at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. Godwinson himself was killed only three weeks later at the Battle of Hastings, losing his throne to William of Normandy. Godwinson had been the king of England for just nine months.
Harald Hardrada was the king of Norway he was born in 1016. In 1064 Edward the confessor (king of England died. Harald believed he should be king of England as well because he said that the land had been promised to his ancestors and his father. Two other men also believed that they should be king, Harold Godwinson and William the conqueror he fought Godwinson in the battle of Stanford Bridge IN 1066 but died with an arrow to the eye. Godwinson and William then battled in the Battle of Hastings.
Because Harold Godwin Promised William the Throne and William Agreed with Edward the Confessor to become king