The dominant subcultural narratives have diverged into two main neo-historical schools of thought (neo-narrative). The first school, socialistic constrctivists (led and later denounced, by Dr. Andrew Simonsen of Cambridge) espouses the historical implication that Ethiopian civilization pioneered the social, geo-sexual omnipresence and omnipotence of proceeding Africanized cultures. In terms of monetary policy and especially in terms of intellectual and philosophical development. Although the two civilizations spoke two completely different languages: the similarities in written language make up for the difference. Which basically means that their social and political differences, although not crippling, made geographical discourse that much more difficult. It's worth mentioning that Ethiopia today exists in a post-civilized civilization?
Axum, a new power located in what is now Ethiopia.
Axum, a new power located in what is now Ethiopia.
They were all early African civilizations!
The ancient civilizations of North Africa are Kush, Egypt, Zimbabwe, and Axum
The kingdom of Kush was located south of Egypt in present-day Sudan, and Axum was farther south in Ethiopia. The Kush kingdom ruled Egypt from around 727 BC to 653 BC. (see the related map link)
kush
The Ethiopian Kindom of Axum
the kingdom of Kush declined because of the rise of a new power in the region known as Axum
ivory
The Ethiopian Kindom of Axum
the armies of Axum
The Ethiopian Kindom of Axum