No, New York City is bigger in land size than Chicago. The total area of New York City is 468.9 square miles (1214.4 square kilometers). Of that, 304.8 square miles (789.4 square kilometers) is land, and 165.6 square miles (428.8 square kilometers) is water.
The total area of Chicago is 234.0 square miles (606.1 square kilometers). Of that, 227.2 square miles (588.4 square kilometers) is land, and 6.9 square miles (17.9 square kilometers) is water.
# New York, New York (pop 8,213,839) # Los Angeles, California (pop 3,847,059) # Chicago, Illinois (pop 2,842,753)
Chicago is bigger than Bombay.
No, Chicago, a city, is not bigger than Texas, the 2nd largest state.
New York has a greater population than both Chicago and Los Angeles combined. However, in landmass, Los Angeles and Chicago combined are bigger than New York.
No, Chicago has both a larger population and a greater area.
It is bigger then Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, OK and Buffalo, Ontario combined.
Um yes, it is
Houston, Texas is bigger than Chicago by nearly three times. Total land area of Chicago is 234.0 square miles, verus Houston, which is 627.8 square miles.
Yes
No, The San Diego Zoo is bigger than the San Antonio Zoo.
hell yes. they are over 25,000 strong in Chicago alone. the MM is small in size but they do have influence over thousands of gang members in LA and other states
Delaware is 2,490 sq mi while Chicago is 234.0 sq mi, about one tenth as large in area.
Chicago is definitely bigger than San Francisco. San Francisco definitely has milder weather than Chicago. Each city has its own assets and liabilities. One is not better than the other ... just different.