Absolutely. Bushrangers posed a genuine threat, and many could be ruthless.
There was no leader of the bushrangers. Bushrangers operated in small gangs, or occasionally alone, and they formed one of the hazards of life in rural Australia for many decades. Therefore, there could be no single leader.
bushrangers
there were more than 4
A gang of bushrangers, like "Ned Kelly's gang."A collective noun is a word for a group of people or things. I don't believe that bushrangers, loners at heart, get together often enough for a collective noun to become theirs. You have to use a general collective noun used for people based on their situation or activity, including group to start you off; a troop of bushrangers, a crowd of bushrangers, a mob of bushrangers, a boatload of bushrangers, a convention of bushrangers, a meeting of bushranges, a party of bushrangers, or a pair of bushrangers.
Bushrangers mainly used horses.
well you wood have to brake the law
Murray Bushrangers was created in 1993.
Bushrangers primarily used horses for transportation.
The high numbers of bushrangers in the 1700s and early 1800s were due to the numbers of escaped convicts. Becoming a bushranger was often the only way for an escaped convict to survive. Numbers of bushrangers after 1851 increased as a result of the gold rushes. Coaches or people on horseback carrying gold from the goldfields were easy targets for bushrangers.
Yes. Bushrangers were criminals who would ambush unsuspecting travellers or even landowners, stealing their money and goods. A few bushrangers resorted to murder.
Bushrangers usually committed murder, robbery, theft, assault and other crimes.