Want this question answered?
Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois showed that states need to regulate certain businesses
it allowed the government to set prices over some private businesses
Chicago.
government to set prices over some private businesses.
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The question that the case was concerned with was whether a state could regulate charges for grain elevators. This is expanded - using the idea that a state has the right to regulate commerce within that state - to the fact that if a private utility is used in the public good, it should be regulated by the state, as the state is acting on behalf of the people's interest.Granger laws were legal...Apex...:)
Absolutely nothing.
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The US Supreme Court defined certain private businesses as "private utilities" operating in the public interest, and gave the States the right to regulate the prices they charged their customers. Munn specifically addressed the use of grain elevators, but the Court's decision applied the regulatory rights across a broad spectrum of industries, including railroads, that operated intrastate.
Farmers had political power
the granger laws were legal
No, The result was The Interstate Commerce Commission.
it allowed the government to set prices over some private businesses (apex)
munn vs Illinois