No. This eventually resulted in the Texas Revolution (1835-1836).
See the related questions section for further details.
Texans wanted independence from Mexico, largely due to their reliance on slavery, after Mexico ended the practice.
When Texas gained independence from Mexico, it fiercely fought to protect and guarantee its slavery rights. While Texas remained its own independent nation as the Republic of Texas, little notable attention from the United States was given to the newborn country with regards to the slavery issue. However, once the Union began discussions on the possible annexation of Texas, the slavery issue burst through once the free states realized that Texas' annexation would upset the balance of free and slave states representation.
It never solved the slavery question. The most serious consecuence was the American Civil War (1861 - 1865)
The issue of slavery in the territory ceded by Mexico was decided by the Compromise of 1850, which allowed residents to determine whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This meant that the territories of New Mexico and California could decide on the slavery issue for themselves when applying for statehood.
Jackson didn't want to inflame the slavery issue again and annexing Texas so soon from Texas's independence might have started another war with Mexico. Hope i could help
The issue you seek is slavery.
--Answer-- The Mexican government did not permit slavery.. So when Texas broke from Mexico and formed a Republic people in the south natural thought that because one of the stated reasons for the break dealt with the issue of slavery and the right to have slaves..
Former Mexican territories were supposed to ban slavery, except Texas. This was defined ion the Wilmot Proviso (1846). However, it was not enforced, and caused further divisions between pro-slavery states and the North. It resulted in the American Civil War (1861-1865).
slavery
The US was uneasy in annexing Texas because it would bring about an unbalance of power in the Senate between the North and the South who each wanted an equal number of representatives to side on with the issue of slavery. When Sam Houston beat Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna at San Jacinto he immediately applied for statehood but President Jackson feared the revival of the slavery issue. President Van Buren followed suit with Jackson and did not approve the annexation of Texas. The question of Texas, California and the New Mexican territory were increasingly prominent, and the sectional tension which they produced was destined to lead to the Civil War. President Tyler (a previous Whig whose political party had abandoned him) by means of a joint resolution which only required a simple majority was successful in getting Texas admitted to the Union in 184
Slavery probably did not play a major role in the War with Mexico. After Mexico lost the Texas War of Independence, she built up a much better trained and more powerful army. When a Mexican Army crossed the Rio Grand River and started the war, the English observers though Mexico would win the war. At the Battle of Buena Vista outside of Monterrey, the Mexicans probably would have prevailed the next day. Instead, a coup d'etat occurred in Mexico city. Santa Anna withdrew his troops. The Battle of Vera Cruz was the only real battle that occurred when the Americans landed. They kept performing maneuvers to get between the Mexican army and Mexico City. Mexico city fell without a fight. While slavery was not an issue as a cause of the war and was not an issue during the war, it was an issue after the war. The United States had the option of drawing its southern border anywhere it chose. When the commissioner realized that slavery was not feasible south of Texas, he kept the border of Texas where it was. So slavery played a role after the war ended. Since California and Utah had fought on the side of the United States, he took them into the United States.
slavery