why did hamilton defend the loyalists in court after the american revolution
The analogy of attack and defend as condemn is to criticize. Both pairs involve opposing actions or responses, with attack and condemn being more forceful and aggressive, while defend and criticize involve protecting or evaluating something with a more nuanced approach.
A statement of justification is an explanation or reasoning provided to support or defend a decision, action, or belief. It helps to clarify the rationale behind a particular choice or course of action.
The opposite of assail (attack, malign) would be to defend, support, or champion.
This is a complex question based in part of a court decision in 1803; basically congress has sworn an oath to support and defend the US Constitution, so they could hardly violate it by destroying it, while under oath to support it.
The Founding Fathers stood by their decision to defend the country. Even when faced with death, loss of home family and property they did not give up. Many lived on the run during the Revolution because they were singled out as traitors to the King of England.
Depending on context "defend" can mean protect, fortify, support, justify, explain, endorse.
he was going to pay but he didnt
People had to be willing to defend and support their country
Loyalists support the leaders, patriots defend their country. During the American Revolution Loyalists supported the rule of the English King while Patriots wanted a new government for the colonies (they were not states yet).
Camp Humphreys's motto is 'Sustain, Support, Defend'.
Yongsan Garrison's motto is 'Sustain, Support, Defend'.