Generally speaking, yes.
Most of the students at Ivy League schools are from wealthy, affluent families.
Inner city and urban schools are often used interchangeably to refer to schools located within city limits. However, inner city schools are typically associated with lower socio-economic status and face unique challenges such as poverty, higher crime rates, and less access to resources compared to urban schools in more affluent areas.
Population trends in affluent areas are expected to be on the increase
I think it is RICH.
This varies a great deal. Urban areas, like Cape Town, South Africa, have many schools which are as good as ones here in the U.S. Rural areas in the Congo, by contrast, have some small schools which have very few books.
Howard Becker
Schools in Australia are much like the ones in the U.S. They also have school through radios or walkie-talkies for children who live in remote areas and are not able to attend school.
Trade schools provide education for specialty areas. While they by no means should be alternative options for reputable colleges, they will offer specialized training for areas like medical, education, computers.
For the most part it is basically like this: the affluent people live in the east end, the working class people live in the south end, the west end is primarily blacks.
the grand house was owned by an affluent gentleman the grand house was owned by an affluent gentleman
Urban schools are located in cities with high population density, suburban schools are in residential areas surrounding cities, and rural schools are in sparsely populated areas. Urban schools may have more diversity and resources but face challenges like overcrowding. Suburban schools often have more funding and resources, while rural schools may struggle with limited resources and access to technology.