In my opinion, there shouldn't be zoos, because the animals have a right to live a free life, without being in a cage, and having people staring at them all day long, being fed what the zookeepers want to feed them, eating when the zookeepers have it scheduled. It's just not the life for an animal. But there are zoos, like the Maine Wildlife Park, where they take in animals because they were hurt in the wild, care for them, protect them from predators, and make sure they get all the things they need to eat to recover from their injuries.
there should be no zoos because in the news it showed that zoo killed animals and rot them by bins
zoos should not be banned
no
a
There should not be zoos because animals lose their natural habitat.It is cruel to them as well.If some one says that the zoos should be there hen I'd say that well animals should have as much freedom as people.
No they shouldn't cause they die of starvation in zoos
Zoos should not be banned because the animals live longer, can't be killed and people learn about them at the zoo
no
we should not actually get rid of zoos even though they are in cages but if we do not keep zoos animals will become extinct and if we make more zoo the populations of animals will become bigger
Yes
no they should be free
Zoos help people see animals that they otherwise wouldn't be able to be see. Some people are against them, but in general Tigers are amazing and beautiful and are definitely the kinds of animals that zoos are created to house. So yes, in my opinion, tigers should be in zoos.