The Appalachians are younger than Pangaea because they were formed during the process in which North America removed itself from Pangaea and into the west.
They are about the same age, actually. The Appalachians were formed as a result of the continental collisions that formed Pangaea.
The Himalayan mountains are older than the Appalachian mountains.
The Alps mountains are younger than Pangaea. The Alps began forming around 30 million years ago during the Oligocene period, while Pangaea existed around 335 to 175 million years ago during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.
No. They are younger. The earliest stages of the formation of the Alps began in the late Cretaceous, more than 100 million years after Pangaea broke up.
older
The Rocky Mountains are taller than Appalachian Mountains and has sharp pointy peaks. The Rocky Mountains are taller.They Both have eroded. The Appalachian Mountains are older and shorter than rocky mountains.
No, the Rockies formed as a consequence of the break-up of Pangaea.
The Appalachian Mountains are a great deal older than the Rockies.
Yes, the Himalayas are much younger than Pangaea. The Himalayas started forming around 50 million years ago when the Indian Plate collided with the Eurasian Plate, while Pangaea existed around 335 million years ago before it started splitting apart.
Pretty hard to say given that they are all the same chain of mountains that run down the East of the United States. They are all part of the Appalachian Mountains and are much older than the Rocky Mountains.
The Appalachian Mountains are older and have undergone more erosion, giving them a smoother appearance. The Rocky Mountains are younger and have experienced more uplift and tectonic activity, resulting in their jagged peaks and rugged terrain.
The Rocky Mountains are younger and still actively rising due to tectonic activity, creating taller and more rugged peaks. In contrast, the Appalachian Mountains are older and have been eroded over time, resulting in smoother, lower peaks.