It could be, and could not be at the same time. I'm going to use SQL for an example. Say you have a website, and a user signs up. You would have a users table, first off to store the users information. Then, you would have another table with the actual content that that user has stored. The repeating field would be the USERID.
But, if you have the same data stored twice in two different tables, that's a bad thing.
Chat with our AI personalities
yes
In database there are number of issues to be handled ,like redundant data, inconsistent data, unorganized data etc. Redundancy of data is the repetitive data that is taking the storage unnecessarily . So the redundant data must be removed or at least reduced.
yes. data redundancy is where there is duplication of data in a database. when this happens, anyone who has to make updates to a table in a database (that is, make changes to the database) will have to change that particular data that has been duplicated so many times in so many places. this creates a problem and it is not always going to be possible for a person to change everything correctly. this therefore leads to inconsistencies in the database. hope this helps.
Reduced data redundancy, Improved data integrity, Shared data, Easier access, Reduced development time
In a database management system (DBMS), an attribute may describe a component of the database, such as a table or a field, or may be used itself as another term for a field. Commonly we can say that an attribute is a "propety" of a database field or its a characteristic or facet of the data field..