Part of this is simple.
These together "help" make crime overall higher among blacks.
So part of the targeting is simply that police know, from experience and fairly impartial statistics, that they are more likely to find something criminal among blacks.
Pretty much like doctors are more concerned about blood pressure and Diabetes among fat people than skinny people.
If you want to find something, you look where it's common, not where it's rare.
Other parts are tricky:
One tricky bit is that all this can be influenced by prejudice or force of habit too.
If it's always more blacks that are checked, then you'll find more crime among blacks.
Not b/c they have more criminals, but b/c more are found.
If non-blacks aren't checked, then non-black crimes aren't discovered.
It's just like the doctors.
Skinny people get high blood pressure and diabetes too.
And may go undetected for years because they don't look like the ones usually needing the check-up.
When it comes to blacks and police, it's hard to tell exactly how much of the targeting that's unfair, and how much that's statistically sensible.
As mentioned, If the method starts out lopsided, it'll be self-reinforcing and build itself even more lopsided.
Running a police force does cost money, and telling them to distribute their attention according to the ethnic proportions would perhaps be fair, but probably also a waste of money.
Again, if you want to find something, you look where it's common, not where it's rare.
Specially if you have to pay the one doing the looking.
But in a democratic society, we can decide that. Get enough voters behind a plan to make police attention evenly ethnically distributed, find the money for it and go ahead.
Either way, the basis of the legal system is "innocent until proven guilty". This is valid even for members of high-risk groups.
Blacks are disproportionately targeted by police due to systemic racism, implicit bias, and racial profiling within law enforcement. This leads to increased scrutiny, harsher treatment, and unjust outcomes for the black community. Efforts to address these issues include police reform, accountability, and community engagement.
Life for free blacks in the South was generally more restricted due to harsher racism, limited economic opportunities, and stricter laws governing their behavior. In contrast, free blacks in the North had more access to education, employment, and social services, although they still faced discrimination and prejudice. Overall, both regions presented challenges for free blacks, but the South tended to have more severe conditions.
Plantation slaves typically lived and worked in rural areas, subject to harsher conditions and more limited freedoms compared to city slaves who often had more opportunities for autonomy and financial independence. Free blacks still faced discrimination and limited rights, but had more control over their own lives compared to slaves.
A free black person was not legally owned or controlled by another individual, while an enslaved black person was considered property and forced to work without pay under the ownership of someone else. Free blacks had more autonomy and rights than enslaved blacks, though both still faced discrimination and limited opportunities in society.
Free blacks in the North generally had more access to education, social mobility, and employment opportunities compared to those in the South. They also faced discrimination and racism, though to a lesser extent than in the South. Similarities include facing legal restrictions, such as Black Codes, and social prejudice regardless of their location.
The end of slavery did not automatically result in equal treatment for blacks and whites. Institutionalized racism and discrimination persisted in various forms, including segregation and Jim Crow laws, which enforced separate facilities for blacks and whites. It took many more years of struggle and activism to achieve greater equality in society.
no, he made blacks attacked when he was the police chief of birmingham.
nothing, its just police work. Its not based upon race, its based upon the crime commited. The fact that most offendors are black is not a profile. its that the high crime areas of major cities are populated by blacks. Therefore, most arrests are in those areas
Indian police is lazy whereas they are fast they are stronger than us police they are corrupt
The KKK were more active than ever in the 1920's, they would burn crosses and attack African Americans. They weren't just racist against blacks it was anyone who were non American that they targeted.
Blacks, Republicans, Jews, Catholics, moonshiners, bootleggers, and immigrants.
Russians, Slavs, Poles, Jews, Gypsies, the weak and the lame, the mentally challenged, Homosexuals, Blacks, and others.....
this means that blacks wanted to be treated more fairly.
The more blacks you had the wealthier you were considered. Blacks were used as valets, maids, and entertainers.
Some people turn against African Americans or Africans because they are stereotypically known to cause crimes and join gangs. While a high amount of blacks are in gangs or have committed crimes, allot of whites and Mexican's have too. So people point fingers at blacks to blame the things wrong with themselves at the people who do it more.
The Klan was a decentralized organization. As such, it targeted numerous groups. For example, it targeted Catholics even more than blacks in many areas. The Klan was also anti-immigrant, attacking many Irish and Italians. It also attacked liquor distributors. It also supported Democratic politicians, intimidating Republican and Reconstruction efforts. Finally, it occasionally targeted Jews, although Jews were such a small minority that they rarely came in contact.
whites
For many Irish immigrants, the new Union draft laws gave credence to the ideas of many immigrants that to be drafted meant that they were going to risk their lives to "save Blacks in the South". Also, businessmen often hired Freed Blacks as strike breakers for the Irish dock workers.