0
The term 'civil liberties' doesn't allow for a 'no limits' option.
The term 'civil' tells us the liberties referred to are of paramount importance to the community and their scope is limited to, or decided by, the community in question. For a soft example, in some communities it is fine to go out with no head-covering; in others it isn't. That's easy to follow and harms nobody. In some communities, for a hard example, it is fine for family members to beat or kill men, women and children for perceived infringements of family or cultural rules; this is an infringement of the injured parties liberties.
A total lack of limits on the liberty of any citizen to do whatever they liked at any given moment for any reason or no reason at all would result in anarchy.
Anarchy is a situation where no governmental or social controls exist. In an anarchical situation any sense of community or personal responsibility does not exist and no personal responsibility is taken for any actions against members of the community involved. In a fairly short time that community will cease to exist, without survivors, or with very, very few. This has been shown for many decades by researchers.
In any civil society the community must be continually aware the notion of civil liberty is a vital part of their existence. Once one accepts the notion liberties accorded to some might not apply to others one accepts that civil liberties apply only to oneself. This concept isn't anarchy, but it does erode the humanity of every single member of that community, regardless of their status within that community.
So, we must retain a concious awareness of the rights of every single person to enjoy the liberty life should allow them. As the American Declaration of Independence demanded, every human owns the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
When we seek, as we continually do, to ensure this is the right of every person, we are seeking enforcement of civil liberties. By definition, we cannot possibly seek a 'no limits' situation on this because that might easily deny the civil liberties of others.
Civil liberties have no limits, but they come with built-in respect for the civil liberties of every other human in our global or local community.
Without limits on civil liberties, there could be potential chaos and harm to society. It could lead to the erosion of societal structure, increased conflict, and violation of individuals' rights. Some level of restriction or regulation is necessary to ensure the well-being of the community as a whole.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What would happen if the great migration didnt happen?
If the Great Migration didn't happen, African Americans would likely have remained more concentrated in the Southern United States. This could have resulted in slower progress towards civil rights and economic opportunities that many African Americans found in the North and West during the Great Migration. Additionally, cultural exchange and diversity in northern cities would have been impacted.
What city has the largest area in Canada?
For some reason, I would say that it still Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Based on square mileage of the city limits.
What would happen if a society did not have any norms?
Without norms, there would be chaos and confusion within society. Norms provide a framework for behavior and expectations, allowing for a sense of order and predictability in interactions. Without them, there would be no guidelines for appropriate conduct, resulting in conflicts, misunderstandings, and lack of social cohesion.
What would happen to society if there were no more social structure?
Without social structure, society would likely descend into chaos and anarchy as there would be no rules, hierarchies, or norms to guide behavior. People would struggle to cooperate, make decisions, and maintain order, leading to conflict and instability. It is the social structure that organizes and regulates societal interactions, so its absence would have detrimental effects on the functioning of society.
What would happen to a Brahmin man who married a woman from a lower caste?
In traditional Hindu society, a Brahmin man marrying a woman from a lower caste would face social stigma, backlash, and possible ostracism from his community. This act would be seen as a violation of social norms and hierarchy established by the caste system.
What do you think might happen if there were no limits on the civil liberties?
somthing will happen If there were no limits on civil liberties, people would have more freedom. People would still feel constrained from certain activities due to societal pressure and cultural norms.
What might happen if there were no limits on civil liberties?
somthing will happen If there were no limits on civil liberties, people would have more freedom. People would still feel constrained from certain activities due to societal pressure and cultural norms.
Can states extend civil liberties or civil rights beyond those in the US Constitution?
Yes. But this would not protect the person who goes beyond the limits in the US Constitution from prosecution in Federal Court. What the states may not do is impose more restrictive limits on civil liberties or civil rights than those in the US Constitution.
What instituition is most partial to the protection of civil liberties?
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is probably the most well known, though some would argue that their fight for civil liberties actually impedes on others.
What would be abuse of a persons civil liberties?
One example of abusing a person's civil liberties, or human rights, would be to use slander to ruin someone else's reputation. Others would be discriminating, profiling, and the taking away of ones life.
What would happen if a center does not have limits.?
nothing would had happened.
What are the limitations on civil liberties and rights?
Examples of civil liberties would be the five freedoms that are mentioned in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition.
On what condition would Picasso allow Guernica to be on permanent display in a museum in his native Spain?
Spanish regain civil liberties
Without the protection of civil liberties how would life be like in the US?
Do we even want to begin to think of what life would be like? Civil liberties are here to protect all American citizens. With as much violence and hatred that still exists in America, civil liberties is protection from that violence and hatred. For starters racism STILL exists in America. Racial discrimination still exists as well. Now we have sexual discrimination and discrimination based up a chosen sexuality. Without those civil liberties there would be countless numbers of death, an increased rate of crime, the continuous prejudice against whomever via mass media, religion would cease to be a place of humane equality. Religious institutions would only house those who are completely indulged in the faith. Homosexuals would be beaten and abused on higher scales. I'm sure discrimination against African Americans and other minorities will be on the rise as well. America needs civil liberties to protect everyday people.
How does the president suspend civil rights or liberties?
Executive orders have allowed presidents to suspend civil rights or liberties, such as when F.D.R. ordered the internment of Japanese Americans after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Moreover, Abraham Lincoln was able to suspend habeus corpus in Maryland during the Civil War.
How would your life be if the us government did not recognize any civil liberties?
My life would be significantly impacted as civil liberties protect individuals from government overreach and secure basic rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. Without these protections, my freedom to express myself, practice my beliefs, and peacefully assemble would be severely restricted, leading to a lack of autonomy and potential oppression.
What would happen if there was a civil war in Kenya?
there will be no peace
