Being born into a social class means being born into a specific position within society based on factors such as income, education, and occupation. This can influence opportunities, access to resources, and perceptions of oneself and others. Socioeconomic status often plays a role in shaping individuals' life experiences and outcomes.
Being born into a lower social class does not determine an individual's future success or opportunities. While it may present challenges, individuals have the ability to overcome obstacles through hard work, education, and determination. Social mobility is possible through various means such as education, networking, and resilience.
The social class system and caste system in India are both systems of social stratification based on hereditary aspects. However, the caste system is more rigid and hierarchical, with individuals being born into specific castes that determine their social status and occupation, while the social class system is more fluid and allows for some degree of mobility based on individual achievements and wealth. Additionally, the caste system has a religious basis in Hinduism, while the social class system is more influenced by economic factors.
J.B. Priestley was born into a lower-middle-class family in England. He later achieved success as a writer and gained recognition for his works that often explored social issues and class distinctions.
Oscar Wilde was born into an upper-middle-class Irish family. He was well-educated and enjoyed a privileged upbringing, which allowed him to move in elite social circles.
A fixed social class system is one where individuals are born into a specific class and remain in that class throughout their lives. This system restricts social mobility and can perpetuate inequalities based on factors like wealth, education, and occupation. It can limit opportunities for those in lower classes to move up in society.
Being born into a lower social class does not determine an individual's future success or opportunities. While it may present challenges, individuals have the ability to overcome obstacles through hard work, education, and determination. Social mobility is possible through various means such as education, networking, and resilience.
he was born into the middle class
peasantry
The social class system and caste system in India are both systems of social stratification based on hereditary aspects. However, the caste system is more rigid and hierarchical, with individuals being born into specific castes that determine their social status and occupation, while the social class system is more fluid and allows for some degree of mobility based on individual achievements and wealth. Additionally, the caste system has a religious basis in Hinduism, while the social class system is more influenced by economic factors.
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
He was born to the Mestizo and worked as a peone in an Hacienda.
There were always social classes. A lot of it depended on which family you were born in. For example, if you were born into a lower class family then it was more than likely you were going to be low class to, and vice versa.
J.B. Priestley was born into a lower-middle-class family in England. He later achieved success as a writer and gained recognition for his works that often explored social issues and class distinctions.
Birth: the family you were born in. Later in life, a good education and a succesful career can take you up into a higher social class. But someone born into a socially high-end family will usually still be considered a member of his family's social class even if he or she is not much of an achiever.
Oscar Wilde was born into an upper-middle-class Irish family. He was well-educated and enjoyed a privileged upbringing, which allowed him to move in elite social circles.
We were studying this in social studies class and I believe it is called ..........: Creoles . They were second the social class when the Spanish took over a long time ago.
because he was born into the middle ages