0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?
own plows
Why Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to?
Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to have more control over their land and crops, as they paid cash rent and had more freedom to choose what to plant. Tenant farmers were also more independent in managing their own expenses and reaping the profits from their harvests. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, typically had less control over their farming operations and often operated under more restrictive agreements with landowners.
What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?
Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.
What is the difference between tenant and sharecropper?
A tenant pays rent to a landowner to use the land, while a sharecropper works the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced. Tenants have more independence and control over their farming operations compared to sharecroppers, who typically have less autonomy and may be more financially dependent on the landowner.
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was?
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.
Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?
own plows
Why Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to?
Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to have more control over their land and crops, as they paid cash rent and had more freedom to choose what to plant. Tenant farmers were also more independent in managing their own expenses and reaping the profits from their harvests. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, typically had less control over their farming operations and often operated under more restrictive agreements with landowners.
What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?
Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.
What was the difference between sharecropping and tenant farming?
Sharecropping involved tenant farmers working a portion of a landowner's land in exchange for a share of the crops produced, while tenant farming involved renting land from a landowner and being able to keep all the produce grown. Sharecroppers often had fewer rights and faced more debt than tenant farmers.
Does a farmer have to live on land to be a tenant farmer?
Not in the US, at least. With the shrinking number of farmers and more efficient farming methods, many farmers (if not most) farm at least some land that they do not live on but they are the tenant.
In chapter 5 what do the owners of the land suggested the tenant farmers do?
In chapter 5 for The Grapes Of Wrath, the owners of the land suggest the tenant farmers to move to California.
Was probably true about contracts between landowners and Sharecroppers?
The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.
What are tenant farmers doing in response to hard times?
Tenant farmers facing hard times may seek alternative sources of income such as part-time employment, diversifying their crops, or seeking government assistance programs. They may also negotiate with landlords for more favorable lease terms or form cooperatives to share resources and cut costs. Ultimately, tenant farmers are likely to adapt their strategies to cope with the challenges of hard times in order to sustain their livelihoods.
What is the difference between tenant and sharecropper?
A tenant pays rent to a landowner to use the land, while a sharecropper works the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced. Tenants have more independence and control over their farming operations compared to sharecroppers, who typically have less autonomy and may be more financially dependent on the landowner.
What was the difference between serfs and tenant farmers?
Serfs worked on the lands of the Lords and most the produce belonged to the Lords. Tenant farmers, on the other hand, work on the lands of the Lords but keep all the produce, and just pay rent.
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was?
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.
Can you compare the condition of tenant farmers before freedom and farmers today what difference do you find?
Before freedom, tenant farmers often faced exploitation and had limited rights, leading to poor living and working conditions. Today, farmers have more legal protections and access to resources for improving their livelihoods, although challenges such as climate change and market pressures persist. Overall, there has been progress in terms of rights and opportunities for farmers compared to the pre-freedom era, but issues remain in terms of economic sustainability and social welfare.
