This is strictly my opinion, because I have not researched on the matter, but I would say it is an interdependence of both, and I can explain my reasoning. For one thing, the fact that replacing a natura; human leg with an artificial and accurate replacement is a stunning work of a cooperation of science and technology. The science comes in where the leg is applied to what still exists of natural flesh and bone, and how to make that adhere to the foreign object; a prosthesis. And on the other hand, it is a technological wonder on the grounds that the various mechanics that would allow this replacement leg to work and function with the human host requires the invention and intelligence to conceive and make a reality.
Science helped to invent and improve it but the actual leg prosthesis would be considered technology.
it is because science is really the study of natural stuff for example animals and chemistry and other endeavor's such as technology are human made and creation but is related because we use science to create technology so naturally its not that different and I hope this helps
A technology, since the actual prosthesis is a human creation that solves a problem. Science is nothing physical. It is the combination of laws and theories that explain our universe and helps us make decisions. We don't really invent science, we describe it. Science is ideas. Technology is human creations. Science generally underpins all new technology. In your human leg prosthesis example science is crucial in choosing (or developing) suitable materials for construction of the prosthesis. The material must be relatively stable, not break down into toxic substances and have good durability. Knowledge of human biology is also important if you want to start replacing human body parts. Basically chemistry and biology are important in the prosthesis development. There is also probably physics regarding tensile strength requirements. The actual end result of the human prosthesis is a technology which solves a problem of degraded human parts. So to reiterate, it is a technology.
Yes, a rock hammer is an example of technology as it is a tool designed to make tasks easier and more efficient by using human effort in a controlled manner to achieve a desired outcome.
Science and technology are a blessing to human life. Without science and technology human life would not move forward or evolve. We would not learn or know anything about medicine or be able to learn new things.
In my opinion technology and sciences are the same thing
human subject
Technology
I would say they come to us in exactly that order: Curiosity, Science, Technology..
Science and technology have influenced human lives a lot. Science was discovered not in the 18th or 19th century, but from stone age itself.
Technology
Science and technology has raised the living standards and life expectancy of human beings. It is however responsible for pollution and other forms of environmental degradation.