The behavior of any organization is shaped and influenced by the surrounding business. Also the cultural environment has a great impact on the behavior of such organization.
The nature-versus-nurture controversy in behavior examines the influence of genetics (nature) versus environment and social experiences (nurture) on individual behaviors. This debate questions whether traits and behaviors are primarily inherited or shaped by external factors like upbringing and experiences. Researchers argue that behavior is a complex interplay between both genetic predispositions and environmental influences.
Behavior is shaped by its consequences. Behavior that is reinforced is more likely to be repeated. Behavior that is not reinforced may decrease or extinguish. Behavior is influenced by the environment and context in which it occurs.
There is no debate. A person's character and behavior are informed by both heredity and environment.
The concept of tabula rasa, which suggests that individuals are born as a blank slate and are shaped primarily by their environment and experiences, supports nurture over nature. This concept highlights the impact of socialization, education, and environmental factors in shaping an individual's behavior and development.
White Fang's aggressive behavior can be attributed to both nature and nurture. He was born into a harsh environment that shaped his instincts for survival, leading to his aggressive tendencies. Additionally, his experiences with cruel treatment by humans further reinforced his aggressive behavior.
Jack R. Vale has written: 'Genes, environment, and behavior' -- subject(s): Behavior evolution, Behavior genetics, Nature and nurture
There is no debate. A person's character and behavior are informed by both heredity and environment.
Nature vs Nurture
Kohlberg's theory of moral development is a combination of both nature and nurture. He believed that individuals are born with a capacity for moral reasoning (nature), but that this capacity is influenced and developed through social interactions and experiences (nurture).
Human behaviour is highly adaptive to social nature. Humans, after all, are social beings. Their behaviour can be shaped and even changed by the society they belong to.
John Locke believed that human nature was initially neutral, with the potential for both good and evil depending on individual experiences and education. He argued that humans were born as a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and that their character and behavior were shaped by their environment and interactions with society.