0
How can Scientific and technological discoveries be accepted by evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
repeated .... nova net :))
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Scientific and technological Discoveries are accepted if their evdicence can be?
Scientific and technological discoveries are accepted if their evidence can be empirically validated through rigorous experimentation, observation, and analysis. Consistent replication of results by multiple researchers and the ability to make predictions based on the discovery also contribute to its acceptance within the scientific community.
Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
The validity of scientific discoveries cannot be based on what?
The validity of scientific discoveries cannot be based on personal beliefs, emotions, or opinions. Science relies on objective evidence, reproducibility of results, and peer review to establish the credibility of discoveries.
Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?
Observational evidence
Which case ruled that scientific evidence was admissible only if it was generally accepted by the scientific?
The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
Is scientific law based on scientific evidence?
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
What is a accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts is a?
A scientific theory is an accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts that is based on evidence, tested through experimentation, and widely accepted by the scientific community.
How well is the big bang theory accepted by the scientific community?
The Big Bang theory is widely accepted by the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origin of the universe. Evidence such as cosmic background radiation and the expansion of the universe supports the theory's validity. However, ongoing research and new discoveries continue to refine our understanding of the early universe.
How is Frye Standard used in courts?
Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. It does not offer any guidance on reliability. the evidence is presented in the trial and the jury decides if it can be used.
Will scientific discoveries lead to the end of religion?
I doubt it.. especially seeing as how lately a lot of discoveries actually confirmed certain religious beliefs. Religion is ultimately about "faith" -- which is belief in the absense of evidence. Religions only fail if they're dependent upon objective evidence.
What is the theory that is accepted as true called?
The theory that is widely accepted as true in the scientific community is known as the scientific theory. This type of theory is based on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation, and has withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
What describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
