ICTS International's population is 2,008.

The population of ICTS International is 3,350.

ICTS International was created in 1982.

Please do not use abbreviations. We do not know what you mean by "icts" and thus can not answer your question.

ICTS is an acronym that can stand for many things. ICTS can stand for Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Internet Currency Trading System, and International Campaign for Tibet.

The only difference between ICT and ICTs is that one is singular and one is plural. This means there is only one in ICT and there are multiples in ICTs.

creates jobs

Information communication technology

good

The bedrock of ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) includes infrastructure such as telecommunication networks, hardware devices like computers and smartphones, software applications and platforms, and data storage systems. These components together enable the creation, transmission, and processing of information in digital form.

[object Object]

Yes

Yes

Yes

I think it bcos the

It's actually humanly impossible. Each ict has but a single puporse in this world, and it is truly only suited to that puporse. You can try your best to put an ict to a different task, but it will always fail. Such is life.

an ict formula is something that can caluculate a sum faster than usuall, it will work out the sum ,, and the software that is used is Microsoft excel.

Yes

Yes, ICTs can still be innovatively used to support low-literacy populations through audio, visual, and interactive technologies like voice-based interfaces, picture-based communication, and simplified user interfaces. These tools can help bridge the literacy gap and enable access to information, services, and opportunities for the poor. Additionally, community-based ICT training programs tailored to the specific needs and contexts of low-literacy individuals can further enhance their digital skills and empower them to leverage ICTs effectively.

There is no specific requirement on the number of human-computer interactions (HCIs) there are on an information and communication technologies (ICTs) system.

ict the use of computers and telecommunication devices for sendind,processing and storage of information whiles icts are the devices used in the transmision of informatin

can ICTs be innovetively used in the absence of minimum literacy levels among the poor?how

E-governance is the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to fulfill government functions. In full, E-governance means electronic governance.

??

Science, technology and innovation (STI), including information and communication technologies (ICTs), are an essential component of policies to promote development.

Information Communications Technologies (ICTs), such as Radios, Satellites, Hyper Text Transmission Protocol (HTTP), and Extract Transformation & Load (ETL) solutions, are a subset of all Information Technologies. ICTs only focus on the "transmission" and "reception" of data, whereas the general term "Information Technology" represents any technology that deals with any aspect of Data, Information and/or Knowledge.

Global Electronic Village (GEV) is a term used to refer to a village without borders, its refers to connecting people around the world using Information Communication Technologies (ICTs), where distance barriers (geographical boundaries) are eliminited using ICTs tools to connect people around the globe. The most noticable of these technological tools is the Internet, which is a network of networks that connect networks around the world.

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

No because most of the poor are illiterate so they will be technology challenged, they will need training to have knowledge of using this ICTs

Tobias Olsson has written:

'Young people, ICTs and democracy' -- subject(s): Mass media and youth, Democracy, Youth, Internet and teenagers, Internet, Digital communications, Political aspects, Politicial aspects, Political activity

'Young people, ICTs and democracy' -- subject(s): Mass media and youth, Democracy, Youth, Internet and teenagers, Internet, Digital communications, Political aspects, Politicial aspects, Political activity

No. Apparently, they've just released a study that it's actually degrading at .23%/year. The cause: People asking stupid questions. Like this one.

ICTS is Intermediate Capacity Transit System which is used in metro.It is also known as ART which is Advanced Rapid Transit.It was first manufactured by Bombardier Transportation.The original versions looked like small subway cars that typically ran in two or four car trains, but the latest versions are more adnanced two-car articulated designs that are not easily uncouplef. ART systems run on conventional metal rails and pull power from a third rail, but are powered by a linear induction motor. that provides traction by pulling on a "fourth rail" placed between the running rails. The design was originally developed in the 1970s by the UTDC, an Ontario,Canada Crown Corporation, a subway at the high-end. During development the system was known as the ICTS, for ''Intermediate Capacity Transit System''. Sales of the ICTS were made to metro lines in Vancouver, Toronto,Detroit.The largest ART system today is the Vancouver SkyTrain, which has seen several major expansions over its lifetime. It is the largest completely automatic metro system in the world, with just under 70 km of track.

Cees J. Hamelink has written:

'The corporate village'

'World communication'

'ICTs and social development' -- subject(s): Information technology, Social aspects, Social aspects of Information technology, Social aspects of Telecommunication, Telecommunication

Robert A. Blackburn has written:

'Exploring enterprise cultures'

'The use of information and communications technologies (ICTS) in small business service firms'

'Government, SMEs and entrepreneurship development' -- subject(s): Small business, Government policy, Entrepreneurship

The trend towards an information environment in which users have access to ICTs throughout the environment. This trend is particularly associated with the growth of wireless technologies that allow users to access online information and services remotely and synchronise data between different computers.

ICT's stand for Individual Career Tracks, but some people from the same place or even family go into the same career so it helps to take the basics of it and tweak it to the indivual's need. ICT's can be used multiple times especially for agriculture and education.

ICT's stand for Individual Career Tracks, but some people from the same place or even family go into the same career so it helps to take the basics of it and tweak it to the indivual's need. ICT's can be used multiple times especially for agriculture and education.

Ict tools are tools that has an input,output and we must be able to process with it.

ICT's stand for Individual Career Tracks, but some people from the same place or even family go into the same career so it helps to take the basics of it and tweak it to the indivual's need. ICT's can be used multiple times especially for agriculture and education.

ICT's stand for Individual Career Tracks, but some people from the same place or even family go into the same career so it helps to take the basics of it and tweak it to the indivual's need. ICT's can be used multiple times especially for agriculture and education.

Farmer organizations can function more efficiently by using ICTs to attract a wider membership and thus generate more funds and provide better services in a virtuous spiral of development. To speed the uptake of ICTs, it may be appropriate for public agencies to provide funds that can overcome the inertia typical of organizations struggling on a shoestring budget. Supporting a pilot project to demonstrate benefits can be effective. Indeed, many examples in this module are relatively small-scale interventions that succeeded in changing the way farmer organizations operate. The challenge in most cases, however, is to sustain the use of ICTs after the period of support. Costs are associated with change, not only equipment costs but also the costs of maintenance, training, and continuing development. New technology must either generate enough extra income for an organization to cover ongoing costs, or individual users must see enough tangible benefits in order to pay for the technology. In the developing world, and particularly in agriculture, subject as it is to the external shocks of unpredictable weather and global market forces, the benefits of ICTs must be very firmly established for farmer organizations to sustain their costs. One way of looking at the sustainability issue is to regard well-functioning farmer organizations as a public good that merits support from public funds, at least initially. Given the vital role of such organizations in helping impoverished farmers improve their living standards in areas that may be poorly reached by other interventions, this argument is powerful. Public-private partnerships are also important, as developments in ICT come largely from the private sector. Dealing with such partnerships will be a critical issue. Private companies need to make a profit for their goods and services, but safeguards need to be built into partnership arrangements so that the farmer organizations (and ultimately their members) see long-term benefits. Where support is offered to farmer organizations that have not yet reached a level of financial maturity that would allow them to adopt ICTs independently, it is important to design interventions that give due consideration to the issue of gender. Women need to be involved at the planning stage as well as in the management of a project to ensure their proper representation (box 8.1 lists obstacles to increasing women's use of ICTs). Somewhat paradoxically, women, despite having lower social visibility and literacy than men, have more to gain from ICTs. Women may not be able to free themselves from their traditional time-consuming commitments to household and children, but armed with only a cheap mobile phone they can find the best prices for their crops without abandoning their domestic tasks. Women who might already be involved in the accounting function of a farmer cooperative should have the opportunity to learn computer skills when these functions become computerized. Such skills will become more valuable as computerization becomes more common, giving women more employment choices. Factors that Can Hamper Women's Uptake of ICTs � Cultural attitudes discriminate against women's access to technology and technology education: What would a woman farmer want with a computer? � Compared to men, rural women are less likely to own communication assets, such as a radio or mobile phone. � Rural women are less likely to allocate their income to use in public communications facilities, except when they need to communicate with family or to arrange for income transfers. � Rural women are often reluctant to visit cyber cafés or public Internet centers, which are often owned by men and visited by men. The café culture often excludes girls and women. � Rural women's multiple roles and heavy domestic responsibilities limit the time they can allocate to learning and using ICTs, until and unless they realize the potential information benefits (and time-saving elements) of using these technologies.

Farmer organizations can function more efficiently by using ICTs to attract a wider membership and thus generate more funds and provide better services in a virtuous spiral of development. To speed the uptake of ICTs, it may be appropriate for public agencies to provide funds that can overcome the inertia typical of organizations struggling on a shoestring budget. Supporting a pilot project to demonstrate benefits can be effective. Indeed, many examples in this module are relatively small-scale interventions that succeeded in changing the way farmer organizations operate. The challenge in most cases, however, is to sustain the use of ICTs after the period of support. Costs are associated with change, not only equipment costs but also the costs of maintenance, training, and continuing development. New technology must either generate enough extra income for an organization to cover ongoing costs, or individual users must see enough tangible benefits in order to pay for the technology. In the developing world, and particularly in agriculture, subject as it is to the external shocks of unpredictable weather and global market forces, the benefits of ICTs must be very firmly established for farmer organizations to sustain their costs. One way of looking at the sustainability issue is to regard well-functioning farmer organizations as a public good that merits support from public funds, at least initially. Given the vital role of such organizations in helping impoverished farmers improve their living standards in areas that may be poorly reached by other interventions, this argument is powerful. Public-private partnerships are also important, as developments in ICT come largely from the private sector. Dealing with such partnerships will be a critical issue. Private companies need to make a profit for their goods and services, but safeguards need to be built into partnership arrangements so that the farmer organizations (and ultimately their members) see long-term benefits. Where support is offered to farmer organizations that have not yet reached a level of financial maturity that would allow them to adopt ICTs independently, it is important to design interventions that give due consideration to the issue of gender. Women need to be involved at the planning stage as well as in the management of a project to ensure their proper representation (box 8.1 lists obstacles to increasing women's use of ICTs). Somewhat paradoxically, women, despite having lower social visibility and literacy than men, have more to gain from ICTs. Women may not be able to free themselves from their traditional time-consuming commitments to household and children, but armed with only a cheap mobile phone they can find the best prices for their crops without abandoning their domestic tasks. Women who might already be involved in the accounting function of a farmer cooperative should have the opportunity to learn computer skills when these functions become computerized. Such skills will become more valuable as computerization becomes more common, giving women more employment choices. Factors that Can Hamper Women's Uptake of ICTs � Cultural attitudes discriminate against women's access to technology and technology education: What would a woman farmer want with a computer? � Compared to men, rural women are less likely to own communication assets, such as a radio or mobile phone. � Rural women are less likely to allocate their income to use in public communications facilities, except when they need to communicate with family or to arrange for income transfers. � Rural women are often reluctant to visit cyber cafés or public Internet centers, which are often owned by men and visited by men. The café culture often excludes girls and women. � Rural women's multiple roles and heavy domestic responsibilities limit the time they can allocate to learning and using ICTs, until and unless they realize the potential information benefits (and time-saving elements) of using these technologies.

Farmer organizations can function more efficiently by using ICTs to attract a wider membership and thus generate more funds and provide better services in a virtuous spiral of development. To speed the uptake of ICTs, it may be appropriate for public agencies to provide funds that can overcome the inertia typical of organizations struggling on a shoestring budget. Supporting a pilot project to demonstrate benefits can be effective. Indeed, many examples in this module are relatively small-scale interventions that succeeded in changing the way farmer organizations operate. The challenge in most cases, however, is to sustain the use of ICTs after the period of support. Costs are associated with change, not only equipment costs but also the costs of maintenance, training, and continuing development. New technology must either generate enough extra income for an organization to cover ongoing costs, or individual users must see enough tangible benefits in order to pay for the technology. In the developing world, and particularly in agriculture, subject as it is to the external shocks of unpredictable weather and global market forces, the benefits of ICTs must be very firmly established for farmer organizations to sustain their costs. One way of looking at the sustainability issue is to regard well-functioning farmer organizations as a public good that merits support from public funds, at least initially. Given the vital role of such organizations in helping impoverished farmers improve their living standards in areas that may be poorly reached by other interventions, this argument is powerful. Public-private partnerships are also important, as developments in ICT come largely from the private sector. Dealing with such partnerships will be a critical issue. Private companies need to make a profit for their goods and services, but safeguards need to be built into partnership arrangements so that the farmer organizations (and ultimately their members) see long-term benefits. Where support is offered to farmer organizations that have not yet reached a level of financial maturity that would allow them to adopt ICTs independently, it is important to design interventions that give due consideration to the issue of gender. Women need to be involved at the planning stage as well as in the management of a project to ensure their proper representation (box 8.1 lists obstacles to increasing women's use of ICTs). Somewhat paradoxically, women, despite having lower social visibility and literacy than men, have more to gain from ICTs. Women may not be able to free themselves from their traditional time-consuming commitments to household and children, but armed with only a cheap mobile phone they can find the best prices for their crops without abandoning their domestic tasks. Women who might already be involved in the accounting function of a farmer cooperative should have the opportunity to learn computer skills when these functions become computerized. Such skills will become more valuable as computerization becomes more common, giving women more employment choices. Factors that Can Hamper Women's Uptake of ICTs � Cultural attitudes discriminate against women's access to technology and technology education: What would a woman farmer want with a computer? � Compared to men, rural women are less likely to own communication assets, such as a radio or mobile phone. � Rural women are less likely to allocate their income to use in public communications facilities, except when they need to communicate with family or to arrange for income transfers. � Rural women are often reluctant to visit cyber cafés or public internet centers, which are often owned by men and visited by men. The café culture often excludes girls and women. � Rural women's multiple roles and heavy domestic responsibilities limit the time they can allocate to learning and using ICTs, until and unless they realize the potential information benefits (and time-saving elements) of using these technologies.

Farmer organizations can function more efficiently by using ICTs to attract a wider membership and thus generate more funds and provide better services in a virtuous spiral of development. To speed the uptake of ICTs, it may be appropriate for public agencies to provide funds that can overcome the inertia typical of organizations struggling on a shoestring budget. Supporting a pilot project to demonstrate benefits can be effective. Indeed, many examples in this module are relatively small-scale interventions that succeeded in changing the way farmer organizations operate. The challenge in most cases, however, is to sustain the use of ICTs after the period of support. Costs are associated with change, not only equipment costs but also the costs of maintenance, training, and continuing development. New technology must either generate enough extra income for an organization to cover ongoing costs, or individual users must see enough tangible benefits in order to pay for the technology. In the developing world, and particularly in agriculture, subject as it is to the external shocks of unpredictable weather and global market forces, the benefits of ICTs must be very firmly established for farmer organizations to sustain their costs. One way of looking at the sustainability issue is to regard well-functioning farmer organizations as a public good that merits support from public funds, at least initially. Given the vital role of such organizations in helping impoverished farmers improve their living standards in areas that may be poorly reached by other interventions, this argument is powerful. Public-private partnerships are also important, as developments in ICT come largely from the private sector. Dealing with such partnerships will be a critical issue. Private companies need to make a profit for their goods and services, but safeguards need to be built into partnership arrangements so that the farmer organizations (and ultimately their members) see long-term benefits. Where support is offered to farmer organizations that have not yet reached a level of financial maturity that would allow them to adopt ICTs independently, it is important to design interventions that give due consideration to the issue of gender. Women need to be involved at the planning stage as well as in the management of a project to ensure their proper representation (box 8.1 lists obstacles to increasing women's use of ICTs). Somewhat paradoxically, women, despite having lower social visibility and literacy than men, have more to gain from ICTs. Women may not be able to free themselves from their traditional time-consuming commitments to household and children, but armed with only a cheap mobile phone they can find the best prices for their crops without abandoning their domestic tasks. Women who might already be involved in the accounting function of a farmer cooperative should have the opportunity to learn computer skills when these functions become computerized. Such skills will become more valuable as computerization becomes more common, giving women more employment choices. Factors that Can Hamper Women's Uptake of ICTs � Cultural attitudes discriminate against women's access to technology and technology education: What would a woman farmer want with a computer? � Compared to men, rural women are less likely to own communication assets, such as a radio or mobile phone. � Rural women are less likely to allocate their income to use in public communications facilities, except when they need to communicate with family or to arrange for income transfers. � Rural women are often reluctant to visit cyber cafés or public internet centers, which are often owned by men and visited by men. The café culture often excludes girls and women. � Rural women's multiple roles and heavy domestic responsibilities limit the time they can allocate to learning and using ICTs, until and unless they realize the potential information benefits (and time-saving elements) of using these technologies.

Farmer organizations can function more efficiently by using ICTs to attract a wider membership and thus generate more funds and provide better services in a virtuous spiral of development. To speed the uptake of ICTs, it may be appropriate for public agencies to provide funds that can overcome the inertia typical of organizations struggling on a shoestring budget. Supporting a pilot project to demonstrate benefits can be effective. Indeed, many examples in this module are relatively small-scale interventions that succeeded in changing the way farmer organizations operate. The challenge in most cases, however, is to sustain the use of ICTs after the period of support. Costs are associated with change, not only equipment costs but also the costs of maintenance, training, and continuing development. New technology must either generate enough extra income for an organization to cover ongoing costs, or individual users must see enough tangible benefits in order to pay for the technology. In the developing world, and particularly in agriculture, subject as it is to the external shocks of unpredictable weather and global market forces, the benefits of ICTs must be very firmly established for farmer organizations to sustain their costs. One way of looking at the sustainability issue is to regard well-functioning farmer organizations as a public good that merits support from public funds, at least initially. Given the vital role of such organizations in helping impoverished farmers improve their living standards in areas that may be poorly reached by other interventions, this argument is powerful. Public-private partnerships are also important, as developments in ICT come largely from the private sector. Dealing with such partnerships will be a critical issue. Private companies need to make a profit for their goods and services, but safeguards need to be built into partnership arrangements so that the farmer organizations (and ultimately their members) see long-term benefits. Where support is offered to farmer organizations that have not yet reached a level of financial maturity that would allow them to adopt ICTs independently, it is important to design interventions that give due consideration to the issue of gender. Women need to be involved at the planning stage as well as in the management of a project to ensure their proper representation (box 8.1 lists obstacles to increasing women's use of ICTs). Somewhat paradoxically, women, despite having lower social visibility and literacy than men, have more to gain from ICTs. Women may not be able to free themselves from their traditional time-consuming commitments to household and children, but armed with only a cheap mobile phone they can find the best prices for their crops without abandoning their domestic tasks. Women who might already be involved in the accounting function of a farmer cooperative should have the opportunity to learn computer skills when these functions become computerized. Such skills will become more valuable as computerization becomes more common, giving women more employment choices. Factors that Can Hamper Women's Uptake of ICTs � Cultural attitudes discriminate against women's access to technology and technology education: What would a woman farmer want with a computer? � Compared to men, rural women are less likely to own communication assets, such as a radio or mobile phone. � Rural women are less likely to allocate their income to use in public communications facilities, except when they need to communicate with family or to arrange for income transfers. � Rural women are often reluctant to visit cyber cafés or public internet centers, which are often owned by men and visited by men. The café culture often excludes girls and women. � Rural women's multiple roles and heavy domestic responsibilities limit the time they can allocate to learning and using ICTs, until and unless they realize the potential information benefits (and time-saving elements) of using these technologies.