0
Luke's Gospel is now known to have been based substantially on Mark, and when copying from Mark 2:14 also says that Jesus called Levi, the tax collector, to follow him (Luke 5:27).
Disciples are not meant to change their minds when called by Jesus, yet Mark leaves Levi out of his subsequent list of all the twelve apostles. When copying the original gospel, the anonymous author of Matthew resolves this by not mentioning Levi and by having Matthew as the disciple who was a tax collector. This could scarcely be historical, as Matthew's Gospel is also known to have been based substantially on Mark (and certainly not written by an eyewitness), and its author could not possibly have known anything about Levi that was not to be found in Mark, least of all that Levi was also called Matthew. However, this usage in Matthew means that it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the occupation of the Apostle Saint Matthew?
Saint Matthew was a tax collector before becoming one of the twelve apostles of Jesus.
Was the Apostle Matthew from the tribe of Levi?
The Apostle Matthew, also known as Levi, was from the tribe of Levi. He was a tax collector before becoming one of the twelve disciples of Jesus.
Who were the parents of the disciple Matthew?
A:Mark's Gospel refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him (Mark 2:14). However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces other disciples including Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the full list of the twelve disciples (verses 3:14-19). Disciples are not meant to change their minds when called by Jesus, yet Mark leaves Levi out of his subsequent list of all the twelve apostles. When copying the original gospel, the anonymous author of Matthew resolves this by not mentioning Levi and by having Matthew as the disciple who was a tax collector. Matthew's Gospel is now widely known to have been based substantially on Mark, and its author could not possibly have known anything about Levi that was not to be found in Mark, but this usage in Matthew means that it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person. On this understanding, Matthew's father was Alphaeus, but the author of Mark's Gospel does not appear to have intended this. The gospels do not tell us his mother's name.
Was Matthew a tax collector?
Judas Iscariot was a thief. John 12:6, ........... he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein. It was Matthew that was the Tax Collector (Publican); Matthew10:3 Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the PUBLICAN; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;
Were Matthew and James the Less brothers?
A:The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verse 3:14-19). Since Levi and James are both sons of Alphaeus, it would seem that they must have been brothers. John is described as the brother of James, son of Zebedee, in the list in which the disciples are introduced, but Matthew is not described either as the son of Alphaeus or as the brother of this James. There is therefore no reason to believe that the author of Mark was portraying Matthew as either the tax collector or as the brother of James, son of Alphaeus. Because Mark does not refer to Levi again, this causes a possible problem for the authors of the other New Testament gospels that are now known to have been derived from Mark's Gospel. Luke more or less faithfully copies Mark, using the name Levi in the corresponding place, as the former tax collector, while John makes no mention of him. The author of the gospel now known as Matthew's Gospel tried to resolve the difficulty by placing the disciple Matthew in the position of the tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him. Because of this usage in Matthew, it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person. Although Matthew's Gospel does not say so, this could mean that Matthew was a son of Alphaeus and that James was his brother.
Which apostle was the tax collector?
The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verse 3:14-19). Luke's Gospel follows this more or less faithfully when copying from Mark.Because disciples are not supposed to just disappear, the author of the book now known as Matthew's Gospel resolved this problem by not referring to Levi, but instead saying in the corresponding place in the text that the tax collector Jesus called was Matthew.Because of the change of name in Matthew, it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person, although Mark's Gospel makes this seem unlikely.A:Matthew, also called Levi.A:(Matthew 10:3) Matthew was a tax collector (Matthew 9:9; Mark 2:14).
Who Matthew in the gospel?
There is no clear-cut answer to who Matthew was in the Bible. The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alpheus (Alphaeus) as a tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him (Mark 2:14). Mark never again refers to Levi, who is not mentioned in the full list of the twelve disciples (verses 3:14-19), but introduces other disciples including Matthew, Thaddeus (Thaddaeus), and James, son of Alpheus. In this gospel, all we know is that Matthew was a disciple and Levi was the tax collector. .Disciples are not meant to change their minds when called by Jesus, yet this seems to happen when Mark omits Levi in the list of all the twelve apostles. Matthew's Gospel is known to have been based substantially on Mark and, when copying Mark, its anonymous author resolves Levi's unexplained absence simply by not mentioning Levi and by having Matthew as the disciple who was a tax collector, so that two thousand years of tradition have held that Levi and Matthew must be the same person.
What name did Matthew use before Jesus renamed him?
A:The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces other disciples, including Matthew (verse 3:18) and James, son of Alphaeus. The implication is that Levi just disappeared after being called to follow Jesus, unless one of the twelve disciples listed in Mark 3:16-19 must be another name for Levi. Matthew's Gospel, which is now known to have been based on Mark, resolves this by never referring to Levi, speaking instead of the disciple and former tax collector as Matthew. As Matthew's Gospel is derivative, the author must have found a clue in Mark that he believed pointed to Levi and Matthew as the same person, yet no such clue seems to exist. It would even seem more likely that Levi, son of Alphaeus, and James, son of Alphaeus, could be the same person. At the very least they appear to have the same father. Luke's Gospel, in copying from Mark, retains Levi as the tax collector in the parallel passage.Matthew's Gospel does not equate Matthew with Levi, but simply replaces Levi by Matthew. Because of this decision by its author, most modern Christians assume that Levi was another name for Matthew.
Was St. Paul a tax collector?
St. Matthew (Levi) was a tax collector. Paul was reportedly a tent maker and Pharisee.
What job did St. Matthew have?
Before he became an apostle of Our Lord, Matthew (Levi) was a tax collector for the Roman government.He was a tax collector.
Why was mathew also called Levi in the bible?
Matthew is also called a Levi in the bible as he was a tax collector.
What job did Matthew the gospel writer have?
Matthew was a tax collector.
Who was a publican before Jesus called him?
A:A perennial challenge for young students of the Bible is the apparent contradiction in which there seem to be two disciples who were 'publicans', or tax collectors. One was Levi and the other Matthew, but it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person. The original New Testament gospel, now known as Mark's Gospel, refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector. However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the list of the twelve disciples (verses 3:14-19). There is no reason here to believe that the author of Mark was portraying Matthew as the tax collector or as the brother of James, son of Alphaeus. Luke's Gospel follows this more or less faithfully when copying from Mark.Because disciples are not supposed to just disappear, the author of the book now known as Matthew's Gospel resolved this problem by not referring to Levi, but instead saying in the corresponding place in the text that the tax collector Jesus called was Matthew. Thus we have two essentially similar references to Jesus calling a tax collector to follow him, with names Levi and Matthew. Naturally the two were later thought to be exactly the same person.
Who were the two tax collectors who associated with Jesus?
A:Levi and Matthew are described as tax collectors in the gospels. Mark's Gospel refers to Levi, son of Alphaeus, as a tax collector whom Jesus called to follow him (Mark 2:14). However, for some reason, Mark never again refers to Levi, but introduces other disciples including Matthew and James, son of Alphaeus, as disciples in the full list of the twelve disciples (verses 3:14-19). Luke's Gospel is now known to have been based substantially on Mark, and when copying from Mark 2:14 also says that Jesus called Levi, the tax collector, to follow him (Luke 5:27). Disciples are not meant to change their minds when called by Jesus, yet Mark leaves Levi out of his subsequent list of all the twelve apostles. When copying the original gospel, the anonymous author of Matthew resolves this by not mentioning Levi and by having Matthew as the disciple who was a tax collector. Matthew's Gospel is also known to have been based substantially on Mark, and its author could not possibly have known anything about Levi that was not to be found in Mark, but this usage in Matthew means that it has become accepted by Christians that Matthew and Levi were one and the same person.
Did Levi follow Jesus because he had not paid his tax?
Jesus Christ, the great motivator of hearts and sensitizer of consciences, was able to move people to change. Having been a tax collector, Matthew, who was also known as Levi, was well acquainted with the burden the people were carrying. (Matthew 9:9; Mark 2:14) As a result he was moved to give up his former life-style. (Matthew 4:17; 9:9-13)
What did mathew do before being a disciple?
Matthew, also known as Levi, worked as a tax collectorfor the occupying Roman government when Jesus called him. According to the gospel that bears his name, he literally got up and "walked off the job" to follow Jesus. (Matthew 9:9)
What was the occupation of the Apostle Saint Matthew?
Saint Matthew was a tax collector before becoming one of the twelve apostles of Jesus.
