Assuming you are talking about the one from The Bible and not the one from Starwars, he was not one of the original 12 apostles. He was never mentioned as an apostle in the bible. I believe that a number of the apostle had trouble writing or were too busy preaching to write so they had other people record the ministry of Jesus for them. Luke recorded the ministry. The apostles lived it. I think Luke's role shows us that anyone can be useful to God. He didn't have to be an apostle to make an impact to the world.
The apostle were being taught to preach about Jesus' life and resurrection. They were told to continue doing the miracles that Jesus had been doing during his ministry. They were also told that they would suffer and be perscuted like Jesus. I think it was for Luke's sake that he was not an original apostle but his part is just as important. He wrote about Jesus so that we can accurately read about it in the bible today.
Yes, Luke was not one of the original 12 apostles chosen by Jesus during his ministry, but he is considered an apostle in the broader sense of the term as a missionary and messenger of the Christian faith. He is known as the author of the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament.
No, Luke was not a slave in the Bible. He was a physician and companion of the apostle Paul, who wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament.
Luke was not a fisherman. He was a physician and an author of one of the four Gospels in the Bible. He was also a companion of the apostle Paul.
No, Luke is not considered an archangel in most religious traditions. In Christian belief, archangels are typically Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, and sometimes Uriel, but Luke is not included among them. He is known as one of the four Gospel writers in the Bible.
The Gospel of Luke is not written from Mary's perspective. It is believed to have been written by Luke, a physician and companion of the apostle Paul, who likely gathered information from various sources to compile his Gospel account. Mary's perspective is not explicitly cited as a source for the Gospel of Luke.
A:Paul apparently had a companion called Luke, who was a physician. Whether he was actually Greek or was from another part of the Greek-speaking world is hard to establish for certain. The second-century Church Fathers attributed Luke with writing the third New Testament gospel, which had until then been anonymous, but this attribution is unlikely to be correct. So: Luke was a doctor; he might have been a Greek doctor; but he did not write a gospel.
Luke was a companion of Paul, and not a apostle.
Luke was an apostle. He was a doctor also.
Luke
Luke
Luke was trained as a medical physician.
Saint Luke was an evangelist and not an apostle. He is credited with writing one of the four gospels and the Acts of the Apostles.
no he wasnt.
Yes, if you look in the Bible it should have Matthew then Mark then Luke.
No, the book of Romans was written by the Apostle Paul. Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament.
The Gospel of Matthew is traditionally attributed to the apostle Matthew, while the Acts of the Apostles is traditionally attributed to Luke, a companion of the apostle Paul.
St. Luke, the Gospel writer and close associate of St. Paul, is not considered an apostle. The details of Luke's death are not known; even St. Jerome of the early centuries could not find any certain source as to how Luke died whether by natural causes or martyrdom.
Luke was an evangelist and author of the Gospel of Luke and of the Book of Acts. He was also a physician and traveled with the Apostle Paul. Luke was a Gentile. Very little else is known of Luke.