The Rizal-Pastells debate on religion was a series of letters exchanged between Jose Rizal, a Filipino nationalist and writer, and Father Pablo Pastells, a Jesuit priest, during the late 19th century. The debate primarily focused on Rizal's views on religion, specifically his criticisms of certain practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church. The exchange highlighted the contrasting perspectives on faith, reason, and social issues between Rizal and Father Pastells.
Some people do not consider Confucianism a religion because it lacks a central deity, a focus on the afterlife, and formal religious practices common in other organized religions. Confucianism is often viewed as a moral and ethical system rather than a belief system with supernatural elements.
Ancient Alexandria was a diverse city with people practicing various religions, including Greek and Roman pagan beliefs, Christianity, Judaism, and later Islam. The city housed one of the largest libraries in the ancient world and was known as a center of learning and religious debate.
People are not in conflict with ideas, they are in conflict with other people who have opposing ideas. Religious conflict in particular is usually characterized by one religion conflicting with another religion, rather than by man vs. religion. Although there are atheists who oppose the idea of religion in general. That has generally been an intellectual debate, rather than a conflict.
The question makes no sense. It can be interpreted many ways. Do you mean what religion has the largest number of followers, or what religion I think is the best, or what religion was the first religion, and on and on.Another Answer:If you mean by 'membership' or those labelling themselves, then there are approximately 2.1 Billion Christians - making it the #1 Religion.
Universalizing religions are belief systems that seek to appeal to all people regardless of their background. They often have a mission to convert non-believers and spread their teachings worldwide. Examples include Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism, which have followers across different cultures and geographical regions.
Beliefnet.com has discussion/debate boards for just about every conceivable religion on earth.
The study of religion from the perspective of an insider or the perspective of an outsider of that particular religion. An insider of a religion would be one who practices the religion and an outsider would be one who watches a religion from the outside with an objective and sometimes sociological view.
Yes I would say it is okay, as we can gain knowledge from others and their religion. But hurting each others religion should not be encouraged at all.
In the Scopes Trial!
Because some people think they are right, then others think that their Religion is right. So it is just a matter on who is right wit their Religion choice.
There is no right or wrong in this question. But I think people will not preach about their religion, nor will there be prayers, mentioning of God, or debate over who is right. I don't think we would be even humans without religion because it's the religion who makes us humans.
No god made man (alternate answer) This seems to be a follow-up question to my last answer. Human beings did create our various religions. Every religion was created by people. Whether these people were divinely inspired to create religion, is a matter of debate. Whether people learned of the existence of God or merely made Him up, is a matter of debate. Religious issues cannot really be resolved on this site (or, perhaps, anywhere) and you are free to believe in any religion, or equally well to be skeptical about any religion. We enjoy freedom of religion, so no opinions are going to be forced upon you.
There's nothing special about opposing points of view. There are debates between science and science, and debates between religion and religion as well. For as long we don't know all the absolute truths, and possibly even after that, people will disagree.
There is still debate going on about why Stonehenge was built. Some people might say it was built based on a religion. Others might say it was built as a way to warn enemies not to trespass.
It depends how you intend the question. If the question is asking why Jews debated religion with each other, it is simply because they did not always agree with each other. Judaism encourages religious dissent and discussion of different religious views. If the question is asking why Jews debated religion with non-Jews, it was usually because they were compelled to by the Christian or Muslim monarch. It was meant to show that Christianity or Islam was the proper replacement for Judaism as the Divine Religion. It was a lose-lose for the Jews who engaged in such debates since the Jew could either hand the debate to the non-Jew and "prove" the point that Judaism was inferior or win the debate and risk a pogrom against the Jewish population in retribution for "blaspheming" the dominant religion. The latter was the result of the famous debate called "the Disputation" in the Kingdom of Aragon between Pablo Cristiani (Catholic) and Nahmanides (Jew).
According to the research in learning psychology living organisms tend to search interrelationships (even if they don't exist). Does religion fulfill this need for humans?
There is some scholarly debate over Shakespeare's religion. While on paper he was classified as an Anglican many of his works have Catholic Sympathies and images leading many experts to believe that Shakespeare was actually a practicing Catholic and not Anglican.