Science is known while religion is unknown.Science is physically proven while reliogion is mentally proven. Thus science is in the past while religion is in the future. However, both science and religion does not raise the standard of human evolution and the middle path between these two extremes is 'spiritual'. A spiritual journey travel inwards while science and religion delve on outwardly matters.
The best material is a trash bag!I have even done a science experiment on the topic and it is totally a trash bag.!!!!!!
If your brother is getting you that angry, the best thing to do is get away from him before you actually do punch him. If you can't do that, try ignoring him and not let him know that he is getting you that angry. People who are totally ignored usually will get tired of being ignored and discouraged that they are not invoking a response.
People at parties, even friends can get caught up in the excitement of the party and if there is any drinking that can cause people to not think about what they are doing and who they are excluding. It probably was not on purpose, but certainly bad manners. Best friends generally pair off, but it would be to your best interest to tell your friend that it hurt you she ignored you at the party. She may well apologize and assure you it was not on purpose.
Yes it is......... I know from experience
It depends on what you want to do. Intercession on behalf to God is not done by science, so religion has the default highest effectiveness there. In terms of spiritual work, science has a fingerhold, but religion is again the main player. For anything regarding a god or gods, and their many acts and representatives, you are best off visiting the nearest priest, rabbi, imam, guru, or whatever other clerical firgure you deem to be knowldegeable. However, if you want to do or have anything requiring technology above the level of the Stone Age, science would crush religion hands-down.
Ahh, lemme guess? Science homework too? I think it is 1150'C, but I'm not totally sure. It sounds like the best answer.
hinduism is the best religion.
It means "Best Friend For Totally Like Ever"!
First Answer (by Tizziec) Religion sees science as a threat because in religion, the unknown provides power. As long as man does not know where he comes from, religion can use fear of that unknown to demand actions, beliefs and money. If science is able to answer the unknown questions of man, then religion is no longer necessary for those answers. In Christianity, if evolution is a fact, then Adam and Eve were not the first, there was no Garden of Eden, no Tree of Knowledge and no original Sin. Religion needs the unknown to create fear in its followers.Second Answer That's a difficult and complicated question. Here are some thoughts (mainly confined to Western civilization and Christianity and mainly over the time period from the rise of Christianity to the present). Prior to the rise of Science, Religion held a "monopoly" on Truth. Religion provided the only organized, comprehensive source of knowledge about the world and the way it worked, as well as how it should work. Religion provided the only explanations of physical phenomenon and how the world came to be. With the rise of Science, there came a new source of Truth, truth that was very, very successful within its purview ("extent or range of function, power, or competence"). The monopoly of Religion over Truth was broken, and with it the power of religion itself was threatened. Well, I can almost stop right there. That is one high level view of how Religion might see Science as a threat. Although in some ways Science IS a threat to Religion, the key phrase above is "extent or range of function, power, or competence". Religion and Science don't have the same purview in that sense. Each one has a niche, and it should be possible for them to coexist. Many responsible scientists are religious people and many responsible religious people understand these distinctions. Religion can provide comfort and guidance to people without trying to compete with Science. Science can continue to do what it does best without necessarily flaunting Religion. There is a parallel here with the "Separation of Church and State". The original proponent of such a separation was the Catholic saint Augustine of Hippo who lived around 400 AD, well before the rise of Science. His thrust in arguing for a separation of church and state was for the protection and preservation of Religion, not the state. The same argument applies today in that rather than trying to confront Science, Religion needs to stick to what it does best to survive and prosper. It is a simple fact in the world today that we all need to "get along" together if we are to survive. I would encourage people on both "sides" of the "debate" between Science and Religion to understand this and make friends to work together for the future of Mankind.
Ignored by whom? My best employee is Filipino and I wouldn't trade him for anyone. Anyone that feels ignored by a society is usually someone with low self esteem.
totally
totally undertaker